Remove Content Creation Remove Designs Remove IP Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US class action against Google Bard (and other AI tools) for web scraping

Kluwer Copyright Blog

It could also undercut the commercial market for books and works already created; this is because, on demand, the Products are able not only to summarize books in detail, chapter by chapter, but also to regenerate the text of books (§ I.B.110-111). 4th 1149 (9th Cir.

Fair Use 136
article thumbnail

Copyright Evidence: 21 for 2021 (a year in review)

Kluwer Copyright Blog

In this post, we offer an overview of the project to date, stratified across CREATe’s core research themes : Creative Industries , the Public Domain , and Competition and Markets. For investors, copyright has become a currency; users struggle with rights clearance (or ignore rights altogether); creators seek ever new ways to the market.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

IP Report 2021

LexBlog IP

Intellectual Property ( IP ) Australia published their 9 th annual edition of the Australian IP Report (the IP Report ) on 29 April 2021. The IP Report, available here , offers a general overview of the current Australian IP climate. Design certifications remained generally stable (with a small decrease) in 2020.

article thumbnail

Metaverse And The Changing Dynamics Of IP Law

Intepat

The Intellectual Property (IP) rights jurisprudence over the years has adapted to the changing technological environment. Initially, there was a focus on the actual existence of creations and inventions, as it is a commonly known fact that ideas aren’t protected under IP law. For example, Decentraland is a trustworthy Web3.0

IP 52
article thumbnail

Court Says No Human Author, No Copyright (but Human Authorship of GenAI Outputs Remains Uncertain) (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Non‑human actors need no incentivization with the promise of exclusive rights under United States law, and copyright was therefore not designed to reach them.” That’s because the court repeatedly says numerous times in different ways: no human creation = no copyright. Concluding Thoughts Again, not a surprising result.