Copying Derivative Work Designs Fair Use 
Copyright Lately
MAY 22, 2023
Five things to know about the Supreme Court’s new purpose-driven fair use opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (“ Warhol “) is that relatively rare fair use case in which both the original and follow-on works were more or less directly competing in the same market.
LexBlog IP
MAY 19, 2023
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court found that artistic changes to a pre-existing work, alone, not necessarily sufficient to make a derivative work fair use. Applying a new lens on how to view the purpose of a derivative work under U.S. copyright law. Copyright law in the U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
MAY 19, 2023
Clarifying Copyright Fair Use in Commercialized and Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from Warhol v. Goldsmith by Jaime Chandra Clarifying Fair Use in Commercialized & Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from the Warhol v. We’re talking about Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. Table of Contents: Warhol v.
Copyright Lately
SEPTEMBER 12, 2022
While these sorts of objects typically aren’t themselves eligible for copyright protection, they often contain pictures or designs which are protectable. Section 113(c) would also allow me to use my photos in a blog post talking about how I flipped the t-shirts for a profit because Alyssa priced them too low. Vila’s Claim.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 28, 2023
OpenAI also made passing reference to the fair use defense, arguing that courts are empowered to adapt the defense “to account for ‘rapid technological change.’” Because they alleged direct copying of their works by OpenAI, the substantial similarity test is irrelevant, they contended.
LexBlog IP
MARCH 22, 2023
Several recent, high-profile lawsuits raise the issue of whether such training algorithms violate copyright law’s restrictions on creating derivative works without the creators’ consent. What is a Derivative Work? What is Generative AI?
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
OCTOBER 6, 2022
Alexander claimed that Take-Two Interactive infringed the tattoo designs she inked on her client, professional wrestler Randy Orton, when the company produced and distributed a video game featuring a realistic in-game depiction of Orton. Oracle , which stressed the trial judge’s role in the ultimate fair use determination.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
91 
Let's personalize your content