article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

Roblox sued for copyright infringement, false advertising, trademark infringement, false association and false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, intentional interference with contractual relations, breach of contract, and false advertising and unfair competition under California law.

Copying 94
article thumbnail

Competitor has standing to bring false association claims for false association w/3d party

43(B)log

12, 2021) After Lexmark , can a competitor bring a false association claim when the false association is with an unrelated third party? This court answers yes, though limits the effect of that by applying what looks like ordinary false advertising analysis. RectorSeal also sells a product known as the Metacaulk Box Guard.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

selling allegedly stolen/converted merchandise isn't reverse passing off

43(B)log

False advertising: Plaintiffs didn’t allege that Nobelle altered the merchandise in any way; “instead, the false statement arises from implication, from the fact that Nobelle is selling products that are not theirs to sell and, in the case of ‘The Line’ items, products it does not have the authority to sell.”

article thumbnail

Clone wars: truthful statements about cloned horses don't constitute false association

43(B)log

This case concerns major players in the world of professional polo, their efforts to produce and clone genetically superior horses, and the ownership disputes that have arisen from those efforts.” Allegedly, these statements, plus the use of the horses’ names as given by La Dolfina, constituted false advertising and false association.

article thumbnail

TM co-owner can't challenge uses authorized by other co-owners (bonus Lexmark reasoning)

43(B)log

Reed objected, claiming to own “equal ownership and rights” to the Jade name and also claiming violation of her right of publicity. This is why co-ownership is disfavored in trademark—but co-ownership is not prohibited. This reasoning also disposed of contributory/vicarious infringement claims against Marshall and Harris. §43(a)

article thumbnail

What legal lines can’t NFTs cross? The Nike v StockX lawsuit may provide answers

IPilogue

sued StockX LLC for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and related causes. NFTs are unique digital assets that are digital representations of ownership of real-world items. Anita Gogia is an IPilogue Writer and an incoming 2L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. The Nike Suit.

article thumbnail

(c) ownership claim allows both (c) and Lanham Act claims on motion to dismiss

43(B)log

Copyright ownership: At this stage, the court accepted as true the allegation that Darger did not gift his works to the Lerners. E waits decades until A is dead; and then E publishes it under a purported grant from A, there is scant reason to credit the necessary ingredient of A’s intent to convey copyright ownership.”