Remove Designs Remove Marketing Remove Settlement Remove Webinar
article thumbnail

2023 Trade Secrets Webinar Series Recap: Key Takeaways and Access to Recordings

Trading Secrets

In 2023, Seyfarth’s Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Compete practice group presented a series of dynamic and insightful CLE webinars, addressing pivotal challenges confronting businesses head-on. We’re excited to share that Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credit is attainable by watching the webinar recordings.

article thumbnail

2023 Trade Secrets Webinar Series Recap: Key Takeaways and Access to Recordings

LexBlog IP

In 2023, Seyfarth’s Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Compete practice group presented a series of dynamic and insightful CLE webinars, addressing pivotal challenges confronting businesses head-on. We’re excited to share that Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credit is attainable by watching the webinar recordings.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA) Webinar – “Hot Topics in Advertising Law in North America”

43(B)log

I always enjoy these and recommend the free GALA webinars to those interested in advertising law; I joined in progress due to some technical difficulties on my end. Teami ($15 million settlement, all but $1 million suspended), where there were other bad things like fighting cancer claims and also nondisclosure by influencers like Cardi B.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 25- October 1)

SpicyIP

Another Drop in the Bucket: Delhi High Court’s Interim Injunction Denial for Vifor in FCM Patent Infringement Image from here Considering Biological E’s launch of FCM in the market, the Delhi High Court denies an interim injunction to Vifor.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 05- February 11)

SpicyIP

Case Summaries Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing v. The plaintiff submitted that though their “Sufiyana” mark has not been registered, they have been using the same since 2014/ 2018 and thus have gathered a substantive goodwill in the market. But how does this finding interact with the position of relevant laws in India?

Trademark 103