article thumbnail

Trademark Infringement Get So “Lucky”

IP and Legal Filings

The Respondent secured federal trademark registration for “Get Lucky” in 1986, and the Petitioner commenced offering garments employing the registered trademark “Lucky Brand” and term “Lucky” a few years later, in 1990. This case saw the issuance of several marks.

article thumbnail

Trademarks as a Barrier to Free-Speech: An Examination of the MetaBirkins Dispute

SpicyIP

This article seeks to examine how trademark law interacts with the freedom of expression of artists to choose the subject matters they wish to engage with, using the dispute between Hermès, a fashion industry giant and Mason Rothschild, a digital artist, as a contextual backdrop. The Hermès-Rothschild Dispute. Ltd vs Google India Pvt.

Trademark 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Coach narrowly alleges grounds for cancellation of similar marks

43(B)log

Instead, a plaintiff must plead “specific facts reflecting [the defendant’s] activity that, if proved, would amount to an attempt to create the impression that [the plaintiff] is the source of [the defendant’s] services” or goods, such as conduct outside use of the registered mark itself. Chunma USA, Inc., 2021 WL 1534988, No.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 05- February 11)

SpicyIP

Introduced to incorporate the Jan Vishwas Act amendments within the Trade Marks Act, the proposed Rules prescribe an adjudication mechanism to hear complaints alleging false representation of a mark as a registered trademark. Read the detailed comments authored by Pranav, Praharsh, Swaraj, and Reva on these Rules.

Trademark 103
article thumbnail

Renting legitimate goods isn't actionable, at least with disclaimer

43(B)log

May 20, 2021) (R&R) Proactive alleged that Pine infringed registered trademarks associated with Proactive’s groundwater sampling pumps and their components and engaged in counterfeiting. Proactive Environmental Products Int’l, LLC v. Pine Environmental Servs., 8:21-cv-250-CEH-CPT, 2021 WL 3025481 (M.D.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 6- February 12)

SpicyIP

Delhi High Court clarifies that for “lack of novelty” to be used as a defence against a Design infringement claim, the lack of novelty is to be seen as on the date of registration of design and not thereafter. trademark trial over ‘MetaBirkin’ NFTs. lawsuit over infinity-logo trademark.

Designs 52
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 18- March 24)

SpicyIP

Kunal Makkar & Anr on 14 March 2024, Delhi High Court Image from here The petition concerned alleged violations of a previous judgment where respondents undertook not to imitate, copy, manufacture, or sell shoes imitative of the petitioner’s designs. Christian Louboutin Sas & Anr v.s