article thumbnail

using competitor's images in comparative advertising is fair use even when appearance isn't being compared

43(B)log

The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. LJD therefore reduced the amount of business it conducted with Creager until it could determine how the litigation between Creager and IDT was resolved. The ads used the entire images.

article thumbnail

WIPIP session 4: ™ & Consumers

43(B)log

Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Dougies for diapers.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Artistic Expression or Crass Commercialism? Drawing the lines in Right of Publicity, Lanham Act, and Commercial Speech Cases

43(B)log

Malwarebytes, which allowed a false advertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Then I’ll talk about the 9 th Circuit case Enigma Software v.

article thumbnail

disparagement campaign in niche jewelry market could violate Lanham Act

43(B)log

Both sides now claim the other is liable for false advertising, among other claims.” Defendants also allegedly infringed RCI’s trademarks by using photographs of Roberto Coin jewelry and RCI’s logo in Kings Stone’s advertising after RCI terminated the relationship. And yes even borsheims has to be held accountable.”

article thumbnail

Cardozo A&ELJ symposium, Trademark

43(B)log

Static Controls in 2012, a Lanham Act false advertising case, the Court gave us two more principles for interpreting section 43: a statutory cause of action extends only to plaintiffs whose interests “fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked.” None of those were branding uses. Then, in Lexmark v.

article thumbnail

TMSR Session 3: Private Actors…and their Machines

43(B)log

Can enshrine things like notice & takedown in © law, but that has effects on the ability to assert fair use. We know that automated systems designed to flag infringements get lots of false positives b/c they can’t recognize fair use; may also be false negatives, though that’s not the focus.

article thumbnail

WIPIP session 5: Anti-Circumvention

43(B)log

Allowed producers to control coffee machines by putting software in them; can prevent use, resale, using unsupported coffee. In fair use, 3 of 4 factors center on the copyrighted work, while the first attends to the use, but not to the policy implications of the use or the moral/political status of the user.

Privacy 59