article thumbnail

Clarifying Copyright Fair Use in Commercialized and Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from Warhol v. Goldsmith

LexBlog IP

Clarifying Copyright Fair Use in Commercialized and Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from Warhol v. Goldsmith by Jaime Chandra Clarifying Fair Use in Commercialized & Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from the Warhol v. We’re talking about Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. Let’s dive in!

article thumbnail

3 Count: No Impact

Plagiarism Today

1: Google/Oracle Doesn’t Affect Warhol Fair-Use Ruling, 2nd Circ Says. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Google, granting a broader fair use exemption to computer code. In that case, they found that Warhol’s use of her photographs of Prince in an artistic piece was not a fair use.

Fair Use 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

3 Count: Levitating Lawsuit

Plagiarism Today

However, the lower court tossed the lawsuit, saying that the use was a fair use, and awarded the school some $10,266.37 The decision was heavily swayed by the fact that Bell is a “serial litigant” that has filed dozens of similar lawsuits over the course of a decade.

article thumbnail

Is the Grinch Slasher Film a Protected Parody?

Plagiarism Today

While parody isn’t protected in the Constitution, fair use was codified into U.S. The Mean One isn’t the far from the first raunchy parody of How the Grinch Stole Christmas and, if litigation does happen, it won’t be the first to end up in court. Porn Parodies and Fair Use. appeared first on Plagiarism Today.

article thumbnail

Tattoos and Copyright: A Potent Combination

Plagiarism Today

Implied License – Second, Take-Two could have argued that, by placing the tattoo on Randy Orton, that Alexander granted an implied license for it to be used as part of his image, including on TV, film and video games. While these would be three defenses that Take-Two could claim, the jury only got the chance to weigh one, fair use.

Copyright 203
article thumbnail

Court Quashes 512(h) Subpoena on First Amendment Grounds–In re 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” Second, Bayside said that copyright already accommodates First Amendment considerations via the fair use defense (citing the Reddit case ). Finally, there are genuine obstacles to MoneyBags’s participation, given the expense of litigation and the lack of a contrasting economic incentive in this suit. Nature of the use.

article thumbnail

3 Count: Unplanned Floors

Plagiarism Today

The lawsuit was brought James’ Designworks, an aggressive litigant that has brought many similar lawsuits over alleged infringement of its floor plans and home designs. This sends the case back to the district court where other defenses, most notably fair use, will have to be weighed next.

Reporting 130