Remove patent-reexamination
article thumbnail

Combining Multiple Inventions into a Single Patent Application: Risks vs. Cost Savings

LexBlog IP

Combining Multiple Inventions in an Single Patent Application @media screen and (max-width: 1023px) {.thegem-vc-text.thegem-custom-640f87a71087f6782{display: However, is combining multiple related inventions into a single patent application worth the cost savings?

article thumbnail

“Winning” Prosecution Arguments Can Invalidate Your Patent As Indefinite

Intellectual Property Law Blog

District Court of Delaware that patent claims were invalid for indefiniteness based on conflicting positions taken by the patentee during prosecution. Specifically, the Federal Circuit held that the conflicting positions leave one of ordinary skill without reasonable certainty regarding the scope of the invention. Background.

Patent 100
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Written Description as a Subset of Novelty and Nonobviousness

Patently-O

D746,078 (Patent being litigated). Zahner sued Katri Sales for infringement, and the defendant turned-around and filed a request for ex parte reexamination. The examiner found some great prior art from 2013, which predates this particular design application filing date. Close-up of the Design Patent drawing.

article thumbnail

Post-Grant Review

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Post-grant review was introduced by the America Invents Act (AIA) as a counterpart to inter partes review. As of September 16, 2012 post-grant review became available for covered business method patents irrespective of their priority date. Final Rules for Trials before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

article thumbnail

A Request for Grace Period for a Novelty Art Should Be Submitted Within Two Months When the Patentee Knew or Should Have Known About the Novelty Art After the Patent Application Was Filed

LexBlog IP

The Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department (PRID) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) invalidated the CN Invention Patent No. within six months before the priority date of the ’987 patent), and all the inventors of the ’987 patent are also authors of the article.

Art 52
article thumbnail

Patents for Humanity: The USPTO Recognizes Innovation Relating to COVID-19

IP Tech Blog

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced the final deadline for submission of applications for its Patents for Humanity COVID-19 award: The submission deadline is 5 p.m. The USPTO will only continue to accept applications for the Patents for Humanity COVID-19 category until September 30, 2021.

Patent 57
article thumbnail

Patents for Humanity: The USPTO Recognizes Innovation Relating to COVID-19

LexBlog IP

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced the final deadline for submission of applications for its Patents for Humanity COVID-19 award: The submission deadline is 5 p.m. The USPTO will only continue to accept applications for the Patents for Humanity COVID-19 category until September 30, 2021.

Patent 52