Public-Use Bar: What Startups Need to Know
IP Watchdog
OCTOBER 26, 2023
However, fewer startups are aware of the public-use bar and how activities pursued with the goal of growing their businesses may unwittingly invoke it.
This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.
IP Watchdog
OCTOBER 26, 2023
However, fewer startups are aware of the public-use bar and how activities pursued with the goal of growing their businesses may unwittingly invoke it.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
” The invention was not yet “ready for patenting” and therefore its public use was not disqualifying. .” ” The invention was not yet “ready for patenting” and therefore its public use was not disqualifying. It was also pitched to a potential acquirer. Microsoft Corp. ,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
9,186,208 (the ’208 Patent) are anticipated under the public use bar of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § This is an appeal from a District of Delaware summary judgment order that held that the asserted claims of U.S. By: Allen & Overy LLP
IP Watchdog
FEBRUARY 15, 2023
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Wednesday issued a precedential opinion clarifying the requirements for the disclosure of technology that is ready for patenting at a public event to qualify as being “in public use” for purposes of the pre-America Invents Act (AIA) public use bar under 35 USC 102(b).
The IPKat
JANUARY 31, 2023
The question became whether the patients could be considered members of the public, and whether their participation in the clinical trial therefore constituted prior public use of the formulation.
Garrigues Blog
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
This opposition procedure for European patents is particularly useful when the patent in question is hindering our commercial interests and we have adequate reasons to revoke its registration. One of the most effective ways of obtaining the revocation is to prove “prior public use”. We look at what this consists of below.
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
Last week, in a non-precedential opinion for an appeal from a Patent and Trial Appeals Board (PTAB) decision (In re WinGen), the Federal Circuit addressed prior public use under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § By: Womble Bond Dickinson
JD Supra Law
MARCH 7, 2023
Minerva”) had engaged in an invalidating public use more than one year before its patent filing. . On February 15, 2023, the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) affirmed a summary judgment ruling that, by merely showcasing an embodying device at an industry event (the “Event”), Minerva Surgical, Inc. By: Irwin IP LLP
JD Supra Law
MARCH 27, 2023
clarifying the “in public use” bar under pre-America Invents Act 35 USC 102. Hologic: Background - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion earlier this year in Minerva Surgical, Inc. Hologic, Inc. By: Haug Partners LLP
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 26, 2023
What is it that makes a use “public” for purposes of the public use bar? Does it matter whether the person doing the using is a member of the public, as opposed to the inventor? Or does it matter whether the use is itself in public, as opposed to taking place in secret behind closed doors?
JD Supra Law
AUGUST 15, 2023
Section 102 of the Patent Act holds that an invention may not be patented if it was in public use before the effective filing date of the patented invention. The public use bar to patenting is triggered if the invention is both “in public use” and “ready for patenting.” By: Cooley LLP
JD Supra Law
DECEMBER 21, 2023
The topics of the key cases included procedure in inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appellate Board, the enablement requirement, the calculation of patent term adjustments, the public use bar and the prosecution laches. By: Smith Anderson
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
9,186,208 on surgical devices for a procedure called endometrial ablation were anticipated under the public use bar of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § Hologic, Inc., 2021-2246] (February 15, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment that the asserted claims of U.S. By: Harness IP
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 21, 2023
9,186,208 on surgical devices for a procedure called endometrial ablation were anticipated under the public use bar of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § The Federal Circuit then pointed out that at the time of the public use, the technology was “ready for patenting.” § 102(b).
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 24, 2023
Addressing the public use bar of pre-America-Invents-Act (AIA) 35 U.S.C. § Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JANUARY 12, 2024
The copyright for Mickey’s debut appearance in the 1928 short film, “Steamboat Willie,” finally expired, allowing a specific portrayal of the beloved character to become available for public use. This momentous occasion follows a prolonged journey shaped by numerous extensions and revisions of copyright laws.
Intellectual Property Brief
MARCH 23, 2023
The public display of simply a prototype of a patentable technology for marketing purposes, over a year prior to its patenting, is enough to rule that the technology is in public use, ready for patenting, and is thus invalid. Minerva Surgical Inc. filed a patent for a medical device called the Aurora. The Aurora is.
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 17, 2023
This month the Federal Circuit decided a case involving whether the display of a flowering plant constitutes an invalidating prior public use. It’s not surprising to hear talk of flowers in February, but it is unusual when that discussion is in a Federal Circuit opinion. By: Weintraub Tobin
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 7, 2024
against a news publication using the term “Punchbowl,” even though the publication was an expressive work. The Ninth Circuit, relying on Jack Daniel’s, also recently refused to apply Rogers and revived a trademark infringement suit brought by Punchbowl, Inc. Read more
IP Law 360
NOVEMBER 14, 2022
The Ninth Circuit on Monday solidified a trademark win by former Politico reporters who started Punchbowl News, ruling that the publication's use of a Boston party and event planning startup's "Punchbowl" trademark is beyond the Lanham Act's scope.
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 7, 2021
Novelty: An invention or one very similar to it must already be patented, described in someone else’s patent or patent application, described in a printed publication, on sale, or in public use before the application date (with some exceptions granting the inventor a grace period of one year prior to the application date).
The IPKat
FEBRUARY 1, 2023
Rose also looked at a Board of Appeal decision that considered whether patients in a clinical trial of a tablet formulation conducted before patent filing could be considered members of the public, and whether their participation in the clinical trial constituted prior public use of the formulation.
TorrentFreak
APRIL 11, 2022
However, piracy remains a concern, particularly in Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines, where more than 60% of the public uses pirate sites. According to CAP, pirate site blocking efforts are also driving traffic to legal sources in other countries in the Asia Pacific region.
IPilogue
MARCH 27, 2023
Therefore, although someone may use the original version of Mickey Mouse in a work, they are not able to use this version of Mickey Mouse for any branding purposes or any purpose that would cause consumers to be confused about the source of the Mickey Mouse product.
Patently-O
AUGUST 22, 2022
And, once a patent expires (or is refused or forfeited by public use), the balance allows “free access to copy whatever the federal patent and copyright laws leave in the public domain.” ” Compco Corp. Day–Brite Lighting, Inc. ,
43(B)log
JULY 1, 2022
Pennsylvania right of publicity: Pennsylvania protects the name or likeness of any natural person that has commercial value and is used for any commercial or advertising purpose without written consent. That is, the likeness must be distributed to members of the public in a way calculated to bring in money.
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 3, 2022
The disclosure shall also identify any publication, on sale or public use of the invention and whether a manuscript describing the invention has been submitted for publication and, if so, whether it has been accepted for publication at the time of disclosure. Patent rights under federally funded research.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
If a trademark registration in a member country is the object of a cancellation action for lack of use, the owner may defend the registration by evidencing sufficient, continuous, and public use of the trademark in any of the countries of the Andean Community.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
If a trademark registration in a member country is the object of a cancellation action for lack of use, the owner may defend the registration by evidencing sufficient, continuous, and public use of the trademark in any of the countries of the Andean Community.
Trading Secrets
APRIL 18, 2023
Disclosure of Patentable Ideas To figure out if disclosing invention details to ChatGPT is a public disclosure under patent law, we need to see if it can be categorized as a description in a printed publication, public use, or public sale. enablement).
IP Tech Blog
FEBRUARY 9, 2022
The pre-AIA version of the §102 on-sale bar stated that a person shall be entitled to a patent unless “(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States.”
The IPKat
MAY 15, 2023
Further reading Boards of Appeal are competent to overturn a finding of fact at first instance (T 1604/16) Confidentiality restrictions around clinical trials and prior public use (T 0670/20) Proving the existence of confidentiality agreements and the celestial teapot - T 2037/18 Image credit: B Kliban
Patently-O
AUGUST 13, 2021
.” That language has carried through the various major patent law overhauls and continues as a prominent aspect of 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1).
Patently-O
JANUARY 17, 2022
We would require a clear and certain signal from Congress before approving the position of a litigant who, as respondent here, argues that the beachhead of privilege is wider, and the area of public use narrower, than courts had previously thought. No such signal legitimizes respondent’s position in this litigation.”.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 9, 2022
The pre-AIA version of the §102 on-sale bar stated that a person shall be entitled to a patent unless “(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States.”
LexBlog IP
APRIL 18, 2023
Disclosure of Patentable Ideas To figure out if disclosing invention details to ChatGPT is a public disclosure under patent law, we need to see if it can be categorized as a description in a printed publication, public use, or public sale. enablement).
LexBlog IP
APRIL 18, 2023
Disclosure of Patentable Ideas To figure out if disclosing invention details to ChatGPT is a public disclosure under patent law, we need to see if it can be categorized as a description in a printed publication, public use, or public sale. enablement).
IPilogue
MARCH 27, 2023
Therefore, although someone may use the original version of Mickey Mouse in a work, they are not able to use this version of Mickey Mouse for any branding purposes or any purpose that would cause consumers to be confused about the source of the Mickey Mouse product.
The TTABlog
AUGUST 1, 2023
Genericness: The Board found that the word “sneaker(s)” is generic for retail services featuring sneakers because it is a term that the relevant public uses or understands to refer to a key aspect or subcategory of the genus, which Nike did dispute. In re Nike, Inc. Serial Nos.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 19, 2023
Also, when holding a trademark registration in Colombia, the obligation arises for its owner to use the trademark in commerce, beginning three (3) years from the date when registration was granted.
Larson & Larson
FEBRUARY 13, 2021
It’s the legal term for ‘thing that is exactly like my thing that was in the public before I made my thing.’ The term covers anything that was sold in public, used publicly, described in a magazine or similar publication, or already has a patent on file with the patent office.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
OCTOBER 5, 2022
Unlike inter partes reexamination, post-grant review can be sought based on any grounds that can be used to challenge the validity of a patent claim (with the exception of failure to disclose the best mode).
The TTABlog
NOVEMBER 28, 2022
Instead, cognizant that such varietal denominations would eventually become the generic designations upon the expiration of plant patent and PVP certificate protection, Applicant risked the integrity of its IFG trademark by using IFG to name new varietals. more than five years old - ed. ] it is immune from a genericness attack.
Patently-O
OCTOBER 4, 2022
public use or on-sale events) and grounds for invalidation (e.g., The case is being appealed to the Federal Circuit, and it will be interesting to see what happens if that appeal results in a decision. Bear in mind that in patent infringement litigation the accused infringer (e.g., Mylan) is able to rely on prior art (e.g.,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
We have resent the email to
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscriptions?
Let's personalize your content