Remove journal aesthetic-intelligence
article thumbnail

[Guest post] Emergent works without foundations

The IPKat

and EU Copyright Law’, recently published in the North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology (pre-print available here ). To protect AI creations just because they are costly is a new version of the labouristic fallacy, or of the “if value, then right approach;” to protect them merely because of aesthetic even is similarly misguided.

article thumbnail

Peer Review, a Critical Step in Scholarly & Scientific Publishing

Velocity of Content

For several years now, I’ve been honored to work with The Concord Review, a journal featuring top-quality academic essays by high school students. In short, for top-tier articles and journals at least, the pursuit of quality is “baked into” each phase of the cycle. It is always the result of intelligent effort.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Peer Review, Still a Critical Step in Scholarly & Scientific Publishing

Velocity of Content

For several years now, I’ve been honored to work with The Concord Review, a journal featuring top-quality academic essays by high school students. In short, for top-tier articles and journals at least, the pursuit of quality is “baked into” each phase of the cycle. It is always the result of intelligent effort. Here’s hoping!

article thumbnail

WHAT, IN THE NAME OF GOD, …?: Intellectual Property Rights In Holy Names, Sacred Words, & Other Aspects of Creation

LexBlog IP

” Jarrod Welsh, Copyrighting God: New Copyright Guidelines Do Not Protect Divine Beings, 17 Rutgers Journal Of Law & Religion 121 (2015). This is true even where, as here, the process was conceived with at least some aesthetic considerations in mind. 7 Journal of Law and Biosciences 1 (2020) notes. 3d at 1040 ].

article thumbnail

Just Humor Them: Jests, Jokes, Satire, and Parody In Infringement and Defamation Cases

LexBlog IP

It was a ruse: He was instead interviewed by Baron Cohen, who presented himself as an Israeli anti-terrorism expert and former intelligence agent. That is so both because judges are typically unsuited to make aesthetic judgments and because such perceptions are inherently subjective”). Goldsmith , 11 F. 4th 26, 41-42 (2d Cir.