Remove patent-reexamination
article thumbnail

District Court Stays Litigation for Second Time Pending Patent Review

The IP Law Blog

28, 2021), the Court granted defendants’ motion to stay pending ex parte reexamination even though the case had already previously been stayed pending inter partes review. As background, on March 19, 2020, the court granted a motion to stay the instant case during the pendency of an inter partes review of one of the patents at issue.

article thumbnail

How to Challenge a Patent in the PTO

The IP Law Blog

The validity of a United States patent can be challenged in federal court litigation. Patents can also be challenged in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which, in most cases, is a quicker and less costly process. In IPRs and PGRs, anyone except the patent owner may file a petition to challenge the patent.

Patent 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Challenging the Validity of a Patent: The Supreme Court Minerva Decision

More Than Your Mark

Hologic, Incorporated that the doctrine of assignor estoppel (a rule that prevents people who assign their patents to a company from then challenging the validity of their patent) is alive and well, but subject to certain important exceptions. The Validity of a Patent. Contact Norris McLaughlin about Patent Protections.

article thumbnail

How does the USPTO Decide the Discretionary Aspect of Institution?

Patently-O

In the case of a discretionary denial, there is no harm to patentees because the proceeding ends and the patent rights are unaffected; the status quo is maintained. In the Fifth Circuit, the USPTO filed a motion to dismiss the appeal–arguing that the case arose under the patent laws and therefore should go to the Federal Circuit.

article thumbnail

Be Careful Not to Unintentionally Bargain Away the Right to File IPRs

The IP Law Blog

When doing so, parties need to actively consider whether they intend that forum selection clause to prohibit filing petitions, such as petitions for inter partes review of patents, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). Patent and Trademark Office …. emphasis added).

article thumbnail

Scope of IPR Estoppel Expands, but How Far?

Patently-O

That prevision bars an IPR petitioner involved in patent litigation from asserting any invalidity grounds that the petitioner had “raised or reasonably could have raised during that inter partes review.” patents only cover infringement within the territorial bounds of the United States. patent laws. ” Id.