Remove topics emotional-distress-damages
article thumbnail

Humanizing Copyright Infringement: “Who Is the Bad Art Friend?” by Robert Kolker

IPilogue

As part of the course requirements, students were asked to write a blog on a topic of their choice. Who Is the Bad Art Friend” offers little in terms of legal Although Dorland’s claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress has been dismissed , her copyright infringement claim is still pending.

article thumbnail

Modern monarchy and the media: Duchess of Sussex wins historic privacy case against the British tabloids

IP Whiteboard

The case raises some interesting questions about the boundaries for media and tabloid outlets reporting on the most private aspects of royal life, as well as the monetary and emotional costs of bringing such a claim for those who have had their privacy violated. Background. 1] [link]. [2] 2] See [3]. [3] 4] See [170]. [5] 5] See [170]. [6]

Privacy 40
article thumbnail

Section 230 Preempts Claims Against Omegle–M.H. v. Omegle

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

2710; (4) intrusion upon seclusion; (5) negligence; (6) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (7) ratification/vicarious liability; and (8) public nuisance. Some of the plaintiffs’ claims “seek redress for damages caused by John Doe’s conduct. ICS Provider. ” Publisher/Speaker Claims. .