TorrentFreak

JULY 28, 2022

These ‘ motions in limine ‘ were submitted earlier this month and the court ruled on them in a recent order. Judge Scriven disagreed and denied the motion, which means that the ISP can argue that terminating people’s Internet access over piracy allegations is disproportionate. This request was denied as well.

Music 133

Music Copyright Contracts Copyright Law 133

TorrentFreak

OCTOBER 20, 2022

The “repeat infringer” issue remains a hot topic in US courts and over the years several ISPs have been sued because of them. In anticipation, both parties submitted motions to exclude several topics, with partial success. The most prominent outcome thus far is the guilty verdict against Cox from late 2019.

Copyright Infringement 114

Copyright Infringement Music Settlement Copyright 114

TorrentFreak

OCTOBER 25, 2022

Copying isn’t the issue here; it’s the topic of the article that’s important. In a motion filed at the court yesterday, they formally request the exclusion of both. Shortly after the music companies submitted their motion, Grande filed its response. Emailed Boing Boing Article. “Pro-Piracy Website?

Music 121

Music Copying Business Blogging 121

Copyright Lately

SEPTEMBER 26, 2022

I first wrote about the case two years ago , when District Judge Staci Yandle denied Take-Two’s motion for summary judgment. In a first-of-its-kind copyright trial, a jury will decide whether tattoo artist Catherine Alexander can effectively control the use of Randy Orton’s likeness in video games. There’s a lot at stake.

Fair Use 85

Fair Use Licensing Ownership Copying 85

TorrentFreak

JULY 13, 2022

These motions in limine can offer an interesting insight into the biases and framing both camps expect during the trial. A few days ago, the music companies submitted a 19-page motion to the Florida federal court, asking for various restrictions. . Internet terminations are not the only topic of concern.

Music 139

Music Contracts Copyright Infringement Copying 139

LexBlog IP

MARCH 12, 2023

Can a pleading citing “information and belief” for its allegations of misappropriation survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)? In a post for Patently-O , Peter describes how the TSCMJG came into existence. Disputes over inventorship are not confined to patent cases and often arise in trade secrets cases too.

Blogging 52

Blogging Litigation Ownership Reporting 52