Remove topics tarnishment
article thumbnail

Bottles Up

LexBlog IP

As a firm of trademark and alcohol attorneys, it’s always a thrill when those two topics collide, especially on a major stage. Dilution comes in two forms: tarnishment (see my blog post about “evil” bulldozers) and blurring, where the mere existence of similar marks weakens the famous mark. In 2017, Diageo sued W.J.

article thumbnail

Book Review and Discount: Propriété intellectuelle et développement durable / Intellectual Property & Sustainable Development

The IPKat

-centred perspective, it — unsurprisingly —managed to grasp the essence of the topic globally. In addition, a recurrent complaint by trademark owners, particularly of luxury products, is that upcycling could hide counterfeited products, especially when the goods are sold in large quantities and are sold online.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Whiskey and dog toys: SCOTUS decision on First Amendment protection for expressive works

The IPKat

The Rogers test has primarily been applied by the courts in situations where a mark is used to perform some form of expressive function rather than designate a work’s source – a topical example being the lawsuit brought by Mattel in the early 2000s in relation to the song Barbie Girl. 7 Brand Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” as “The Old No.

article thumbnail

Journey Through “Octobers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) 

SpicyIP

Speaking of this topic, I can’t miss Bedaquiline , the first new drug to receive approval to treat tuberculosis (TB) in over 40 years, which raised serious questions about its marketing approval without mandatory Phase III clinical trials in India and around informed consent of Indian patients. Read Anupriya’s excellent post here.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

This year, we have divided these developments into three categories: a) Top 10 IP Judgments/Orders (Topicality/Impact). Top 10 Judgments/Orders [Topicality/Impact]. b) Top 10 IP Judgments/Orders (Jurisprudence/Legal Lucidity) and. c) Top 10 Other IP Developments. H Lundbeck A/S v. Hetero Drugs Ltd [Delhi High Court].

IP 143
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

As in previous years, we have divided these developments into five categories: a) Top 10 IP Judgements/Orders (Topicality/Impact) b) Top 10 IP Judgements/Orders (Jurisprudence/Legal Lucidity) c) Top 10 IP Legislative and Policy Related Developments d) Other IP Developments; and e) Other Notable Developments. RDB and Co.

IP 124