43(B)log
JULY 1, 2022
2004), in which the defendant continued to run an infomercial after its agreement with the individual plaintiff, Lundin, featured in the infomercial expired. That is, the likeness must be distributed to members of the public in a way calculated to bring in money. There are no allegations of such use here.” The court cited Mktg.
SpicyIP
JANUARY 5, 2024
On 8th December, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released draft guidelines inviting comments on the use of “March-In” rights in furtherance of the Biden administration’s objective of lowering drug prices. which requires patented products to be significantly manufactured in the US until it is commercially infeasible.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
FEBRUARY 4, 2021
The parties are currently engaged in supplemental expert discovery on Hospira and Pfizer’s on-sale bar and public use defenses, and the court has resolved two discovery disputes this year stemming from these issues. In particular, Judge Reyna would have interpreted the “2004 Accord & Satisfaction between Roche. . .
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content