Remove 2004 Remove Contracts Remove Copyright Remove Fair Use
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2021 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Some of the major changes to the book this year: I added a note on the Copyright Claims Board. Over the years, I’ve posted a number of book excerpts that are accessible for free, including: The entire chapter on online contracts. It makes a nice module to add an online contracts piece to another course. Toys ‘R’ Us v.

Editing 145
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2022 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Over the years, I’ve posted a number of book excerpts that are accessible for free, including: The entire chapter on online contracts. The chapter makes a nice module to add discussion about online contracts to another course. Primer on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB) (now deleted). Toys ‘R’ Us v. Note About Fair Use.

Editing 140
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial! ??–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

A refresher: in 1998, Congress created a notice-and-takedown scheme for user-submitted items that allegedly infringe copyright. Copyright owners send takedown notices, and service providers either remove the items or lose the safe harbor. The DMCA’s main counterbalance to copyright owner overreach was supposed to be 512(f).

article thumbnail

13 Spooky Copyright Cases, Just in Time for Halloween

Copyright Lately

Here are some of the greatest copyright horror stories, featuring such classics as “Nightmare on Elm Street,” “Halloween,” “Dracula,” “Ghostbusters” and … a creepy McDonalds character? The only thing scarier than a slasher flick is a lawsuit. It’s Halloween time again!

Copyright 144
article thumbnail

IPSC Panel 5 – Copyright, Distribution, and Access

43(B)log

Jacob Victor, Copyright’s Law of Dissemination: trying to disaggregate dissemination from use of a work in new creativity/e.g., transformative fair use. Judicial: Google Books/utility expanding fair use; Sony v. Contracts should not be permitted to override exceptions and limitations.

article thumbnail

2021 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

It creates a third asset for creators to sell, in addition to any physical item and the work’s copyright. The extra cash flows from NFTs could spur new creative activity–a win for all of us. The first Supreme Court ruling on fair use in over a quarter-century, and it’s a good one. Emerging Tech.

article thumbnail

2022 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SMART Copyright Act. A very dumb law that would authorize the Copyright Office to force UGC sites to adopt expensive and overrestrictive technological controls as dictated by copyright owners. EARN IT Act. This bill started as a twofer: ban E2E encryption AND repeal Section 230 for CSAM claims. Still, the news was bad for hiQ.

Law 113