Remove 2004 Remove Copyright Law Remove Fair Use Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

Trump loses motion to dismiss Electric Avenue case on fair use grounds

43(B)log

Fair use can rarely be decided on a motion to dismiss, the court said, and this wasn’t one of those cases. Cariou , by contrast, involved fair uses where works were “obscured and altered to the point that [they were] barely recognizable.” 00-cv-6068, 2004 WL 434404 (S.D.N.Y. So too here. Nader 2000 Primary Comm.,

article thumbnail

Revisiting Alberta v Access Copyright: Resources for K-12 Educators in Canada

IPilogue

Photocopying classroom materials in a K-12 public school system may have seemed harmless and benign before the 2012 Supreme Court of Canada case, Alberta v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright). The decision reframes traditional teaching pedagogies by considering the artist and owner rights under copyright law.

Copyright 131
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Canadian Copyright, Fair Dealing and Education, Part One: Setting the Record Straight

Michael Geist

Canadian copyright lobby groups have relentlessly lobbied the government to overturn decades of Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence, seeking unprecedented restrictions on fair dealing that include eliminating it for educational institutions if a licence is available. The caselaw on Canadian copyright is unequivocal.

article thumbnail

The Much-Adapted “Peter Pan” (1904 – Forever )

Velocity of Content

All copyrights, except one, expire.*. Preface: I wanted to learn more about the concept (and applications) of “derivative works” and adaptations under copyright law, and I was searching for a useful example that might also be interesting for readers of Velocity of Content to read about. Peter Pan” (1953 animated film).

article thumbnail

13 Spooky Copyright Cases, Just in Time for Halloween

Copyright Lately

The judge rejected BMG’s fair use defense, holding that the defendants took more elements from the “Nightmare on Elm” street films than they needed to accomplish any parodic purpose. In 1999, Cinema Secrets licensed the right to sell a Michael Myers Halloween mask from the film’s copyright owner.

Copyright 144