Remove 2006 Remove Designs Remove Registration Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

Can Braille Be Registered As a Trademark?

IP and Legal Filings

This is primarily because of the clash between the traditional concept of trademarks and the ever-growing need to find newer ways to differentiate one’s product and services from competitors. [1] 4] Second, the qualification for registering a trademark, both traditional and non-traditional, essentially remains the same.

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law in the UAE

IP and Legal Filings

A very interesting and unorthodox legislative style from the UAE legislator was to introduce an opening provision clarifying the policy behind the Law. Trademarks. Trademarks are protected by registration with the IP Department. A GCC Trademark Law was issued in 2006.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Supreme Court Limits the Extraterritorial Reach of the Lanham Act

LexBlog IP

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court adopted a restrictive view of the extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act, holding that federal trademark law cannot support a claim for trademark infringement against solely foreign conduct. The case is Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.

article thumbnail

Benefits Of  The Madrid Protocol

Intepat

After successful registration, the trademark is considered to be granted and protected in the member states. It establishes an agreement where only a single application plus a prescribed fee is needed to get protection in the designated member states. Under the system, one agent in the home country is enough for registration.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

The Vidya Drolia case laid down certain conditions for non-arbitrability of disputes and stated that grant and issue of patents and registration of trademarks were exclusive sovereign or government functions, thus making them non-arbitrable. Durga Trading Corporation was clarified in this case. In Dhiraj Dewani v.

IP 143