article thumbnail

Why the Golden Bear is Actually Going to Court: Nicklaus Company v Jack Nicklaus

IPilogue

In May 2007, before the concept of name, image, and likeness became popularized by the USA’s NCAA ruling for college athletes, Nicklaus appears to have made a similar deal except it was for “exclusive rights to valuable intellectual property and services”. This agreement involved three parties: 1) Jack Nicklaus; 2) GBI Investors Inc.;

Contracts 119
article thumbnail

Fireside Chat with Deborah A. Hampton at Chemours: Career & Accolades in IP

Corsearch

She is responsible for managing Chemours trademark, copyright, and trade dress portfolio with two major brands being Teflon™ and Freon™. “ My major focus is the protection and enforcement of the company brands and working with the business to craft strategic plans for the brands. It is simply the best.

IP 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Two Founders of Piracy Giant Zone-Telechargement Sentenced in France

TorrentFreak

When OiNK was shut down in 2007, the world’s largest dedicated music-sharing community fell with it. Others still in operation today are keeping the ‘ZT’ brand alive Judgment in France The men finally went on trial in France on March 13, 2023. They are seen as the inventors and initiators of a fraud system.

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Tools for Protecting Fashion Goods

LexBlog IP

In order in ensure the best protection, trade dress should be considered in circumstances where a fashion product has sufficiently established that the design has secondary meaning, the design’s use has been continuous, and the inventor is willing to continuously police the marketplace and enforce their right. 1] 17 U.S.C. §

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Tools for Protecting Fashion Goods

Above the Fold

In order in ensure the best protection, trade dress should be considered in circumstances where a fashion product has sufficiently established that the design has secondary meaning, the design’s use has been continuous, and the inventor is willing to continuously police the marketplace and enforce their right. Peters , 488 F.3d GFI , 193 F.3d