article thumbnail

Delhi High Court Directs Maharaja to Pay a King’s Ransom in a Patent Infringement Suit  

SpicyIP

Putting an end to a 24 year old patent infringement suit, the Delhi High Court has directed Maharaja Appliances Ltd. A legal notice had been issued to the defendant on September 27, 2007 and this was subsequently followed by an interim injunction on September 10, 2009. [ This post has been co-authored with Swaraj Paul Barooah ].

article thumbnail

Within The Scope of This Concise Analysis, the Case of Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. T.V.S. Motor Company Ltd. Is Investigated

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction The main emphasis of the case pertains to accusations of patent infringement made by the defendant, as well as the subsequent pursuit of damages. In year 2007 the plaintiffs (Bajaj Auto Ltd.) of violating their patents related to the development of “enhanced internal combustion engine technology”.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Obviousness Test for Design Patents Unchanged

The IP Law Blog

Utility patents protect four categories of functional inventions: machines, articles of manufacture, compositions of matter, and processes (methods). To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements. The patent covered a design for a vehicle front fender. Telflex, Inc.,

article thumbnail

Generic Industry Skepticism Irrelevant to Non-Obviousness

Patently-O

398 (2007). The Intuitive Surgical patent is directed to a “method for performing robotic surgery.” In 2018, Intuitive Surgical sued Auris Health for patent infringement. I suggest the Auris Health majority departs from KSR by again drawing sharp lines rather than allowing for a functional, flexible analysis.

Art 125
article thumbnail

Obviousness Test for Design Patents Unchanged

LexBlog IP

Utility patents protect four categories of functional inventions: machines, articles of manufacture, compositions of matter, and processes (methods). To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements. The patent covered a design for a vehicle front fender. Telflex, Inc.,

article thumbnail

Top 10 Patent Cases: 1891 to 1951

Patently-O

Teleflex (2007). The Supreme Court explained that a collection of known elements cannot be patented unless “the whole in some way exceeds the sum of its parts” — something that is usually not the case in mechanics. ” Great Atlantic & Pac. Supermarket Equipment Corp., 147 (1950). The Fair v.

Patent 130
article thumbnail

Contractually Agreeing to Not Petition for Inter Partes Review

Patently-O

Although the court did not enter into any serious policy analysis or consideration of Supreme Court precedent promoting patent challenges such as Lear, Inc. 118, 124 (2007). Adkins , 395 U.S. 653 (1969); & MedImmune, Inc. Genentech, Inc. , T]he Parties agree that all Potential Actions arising under U.S. Gormully , 144 U.S.