2011 Copying Copyright Infringement Ownership 
Plagiarism Today
OCTOBER 27, 2021
However, that is just the latest in a decade-long history of discussing copyright, plagiarism and other authorship issues as they pertain to Halloween and horror. So, this year we’re going to take a look back at the various tales of copyright infringement and/or plagiarism that we’ve looked at over the years.
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
What happens when a copyright infringement claim is made against the playwright? This chapter also describes the methodology for the qualitative empirical research that involved 20 interviews conducted during 2011-13 with participants from the theatre community including actors, playwrights, directors, and producers.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 16, 2023
But last year, one supranational interference with copyright law surprisingly did not come from Luxemburg, but from Strasbourg: the judgment in Safarov v Azerbaijan. He sues for copyright infringement and claims damages. The Azerbaijani Supreme Court upholds this decision in 2011.
43(B)log
DECEMBER 26, 2022
Copyright infringement: Infringement requires unauthorized exercise of an §106 right, including the exclusive right to “distribute copies” of the copyrighted work “by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.” Contributory copyright infringement: In Luvdarts, LLC v.
IPilogue
JANUARY 14, 2022
Our hard-working students and community members published more than twice as many articles than in 2020 and the most articles in a calendar year since 2011. Is GitHub’s New Feature a Copyright Infringer? Copyright Confusion: Sony Upsetting Nintendo YouTubers by Natalie Bravo. Copyright Law. David Vaver.
SpicyIP
MAY 23, 2022
On the 20th of May, the Supreme Court, in M/s Knit Pro International vs The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr , held that offences under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 are cognizable and non-bailable offences. The Delhi High Court, in the context of Section 64, in Event and Event Management Association v. Decriminalisation.
43(B)log
JULY 3, 2023
27, 2023) Industria sued Latinfood for trademark and copyright infringement; Latinfood counterclaimed for tortious interference against Industria and another counterdefendant Cordialsa. And the copying here could also lead to an inference of deception. Did intentional copying show intent to confuse? Latinfood U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
212 
Let's personalize your content