Remove 2011 Remove Copyright Infringement Remove Ownership Remove Registration
article thumbnail

Who Owns the Copyright in AI-Generated Art?

Intepat

This burgeoning genre is not only pushing the boundaries of artistic expression but also challenging the established norms of copyright ownership. This blog post embarks on a comprehensive journey to unravel the complex issue of copyright ownership in AI-generated art.

Art 105
article thumbnail

shipping facilitator escapes direct (c)/TM claims; alleged hinkiness not enough for contributory liability either

43(B)log

The logo is registered with the Copyright Office, and AFK applied for trademark registration as well. But the distribution right does not include “the mere transportation of goods without a transfer or sale of ownership interest in the goods.” Contributory copyright infringement: In Luvdarts, LLC v. Kast, 921 F.3d

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

2021 IP Year in Review

IPilogue

Our hard-working students and community members published more than twice as many articles than in 2020 and the most articles in a calendar year since 2011. Is GitHub’s New Feature a Copyright Infringer? Copyright Confusion: Sony Upsetting Nintendo YouTubers by Natalie Bravo. Copyright Law. David Vaver.

IP 106
article thumbnail

Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanham Act makes dubious after Abitron; but what about Article III?

43(B)log

27, 2023) Industria sued Latinfood for trademark and copyright infringement; Latinfood counterclaimed for tortious interference against Industria and another counterdefendant Cordialsa. The order was temporarily stayed pending full authentication of the Colombian registrations. Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. Latinfood U.S.

article thumbnail

The Supreme Court’s Unsettling Attempt at Settling the Debate on Section 63 of the Copyright Act

SpicyIP

On the 20th of May, the Supreme Court, in M/s Knit Pro International vs The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr , held that offences under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 are cognizable and non-bailable offences. The Delhi High Court, in the context of Section 64, in Event and Event Management Association v. Decriminalisation.

Copyright 137
article thumbnail

Tricky Tattoo

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

In other words, it gives the copyright owner the exclusive right to make copies of the work, and to exercise the ancillary rights that come with that monopolistic power, such as licensing rights, et cetera. However, that is sometimes not enough to avoid infringement, which is where registration comes in. Warner Bros.

article thumbnail

COPYRIGHT AND TATTOOS

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

They are as follows: Literary Works Artistic Works Dramatic Works Cinematographic Films Musical Works Sound Recordings The copyright law decrees that copyright protection exists from the moment a creative work is finished. However, that is sometimes not enough to avoid infringement, which is where registration comes in.