Remove 2012 Remove Marketing Remove Moral Rights Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

JIPL Online

x] In fact, on the contrary, memes can operate as a source of marketing and a way to garner interest in creative works in a funny, generationally relevant way. xi] There are countless articles and marketing studies directing corporations on how to market via memes to reach the maximum level of engagement. 511, 523 (2012).

article thumbnail

A Brief Thematic Review of Non-Fungible Tokens and their Copyright

IP and Legal Filings

Following the 2012 revision to the copyrights Act, it was made clear that Internet activities were also covered by the copyright law. The media industry as a whole encourages creativity and innovation, and copyright is crucial for digital media platforms. They serve as a medium for new ideas, images, and sounds.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Anil Kapoor Vs Simply Life India & Ors: An Unwavering Assurance In Safeguarding Personality Rights Against Ai

IP and Legal Filings

” The court ruled that the cricket player’s image rights were not violated since individuals have the right to conduct their business under their own name, as long as they do not engage in any activities that might cause confusion with another person’s business, and as long as they do so in good faith.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The Court reasoned that when the Act was amended in 2012 – internet broadcasting was not alien to India and if the Legislature intended Section 31D to apply to internet broadcasting, it would’ve done so by specifically amending the provision. Ltd and Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. Meticulous Market Research Pvt.

IP 124
article thumbnail

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 2: Will the DSA Achieve a “Brussels Effect”?

43(B)log

Criteria favoring a Brussels Effect are market size controlled by regulator—a lot of firms want to compete there; regulatory capacity/institutional expertise; stringent standards. Traditionally supported a highly segmented, explicitly territorial market approach by multinationals. YT had it since 2012; now only NGOs and gov’t agencies.

Art 45