LexBlog IP

AUGUST 26, 2021

In a lawsuit that was originally filed in 2013 titled, Flo & Eddie, Inc. ” The crux of the case turned on the meaning of the phrase, “exclusive ownership,” which the California legislature used in California’s copyright statute in 1872. Sirius XM Radio, Inc. , Sirius XM Radio, Inc. , In 1908, the U.S.

Copyright Law 40

Copyright Law Copyright Law Ownership 40

SpicyIP

MAY 23, 2022

Akshat is a lawyer currently litigating at the Patna and Delhi High Courts. of NCT of Delhi v Naresh Kumar Garg, 2013. Moreover, Section 64 of the Copyright Act shows that on an action of seizure, the police officer can “seize copies of infringing works without a warrant.” He has written for us earlier here. State Govt.

Copyright 137

Copyright Ownership Copyright Infringement Law 137

43(B)log

AUGUST 5, 2021

Industry pushed very hard against cheap copying, and yet as of 2019 there were only 538 registrations in 20 years versus hundreds of thousands of utility patents. Mark McKenna: Another explanation was maybe these bespoke regimes weren’t addressing actual problems; overrepresentation of people w/specific litigation interests.

IP 45

IP Invention Designs Design 45

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 30, 2021

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that California Civil Code section 980(a)(2) , which grants “exclusive ownership” of a sound recording fixed before February 15, 1972, to its “author,” provides only an exclusive right of reproduction and distribution, and does not provide an exclusive right of public performance. (See

Blogging 86

Blogging Copyright Settlement Ownership 86

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

FEBRUARY 4, 2021

Yet 2020 saw a slowdown in biosimilar activity with the lowest number of annual biosimilar approvals since 2016 and fewer product launches than 2019—as well as a decrease in district court litigation and post-grant proceedings. BPCIA Litigation. Antitrust Litigation. BPCIA Litigation. Biosimilar Regulatory Updates.

Settlement 52

Settlement Litigation Marketing Marketing 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 25, 2022

In 2013 and 2015, it granted exclusive licenses to stream those works to Starz, a premium subscription channel. It’s copyright infringement because an exclusive license is a transfer of copyright ownership. That’s important, because in order to be valid, a “transfer of copyright ownership” must be made in a signed writing.

Blogging 88

Blogging Copyright Licensing Copyright Infringement 88

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 5, 2022

Seeing no immediate litigation alternative, I called for “common sense Congressional legislation to make States directly liable for damages for copyright infringement,” because I felt it unfair that, after Allen , copyright owners “would find themselves defenseless from state-sponsored copyright piracy.” Nation Enters.,

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Government Invention Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

Patent and Trademark Office granted ownership of the word “Jesus” to Jesus Jeans, owned by a publicly traded Italian company, BasicNet, giving the company exclusive rights in America to sell clothing bearing the name “Jesus.” ” (at page 9 and 13). .” World Intellect. 75, 79 (2020). copyright law.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 4, 2023

A relatively new willingness to litigate, but lack of awareness/understanding of copyright law in Carribean is a barrier. Risk of strategic litigation; most restrictive jurisdiction prevails, leading to race to the bottom. Motivation for © owners to change how they view ownership? Is fair use/fair dealing the answer?

Copyright 59

Copyright Fair Use Privacy Derivative Work 59