2014 Copying Designs Related Rights 
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 2, 2023
21, Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000 ), New Zealand ( section 5(2)(a), Copyright Act 1994 ), South Africa (section 2(h), Copyright Act 1978 ) and the UK ( Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 9(3) ). We were not aware that the image may have been created by AI” 2. The focus in these cases was on parody.
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 30, 2023
He worked for large companies, active worldwide in the food industry, which specialised in the design and development of recipes and culinary products for industrial use. Copies of emails between the parties provided to the Court proved that opinions had been exchanged before the composition of the products was finalised.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
DECEMBER 17, 2021
The Plaintiffs highlighted specific instances where the Defendants falsely represented themselves as the Plaintiffs when applying for work for the Kenya Film Commission’s Technical Proposal KFC/OT/05/2013/2014 by using the Plaintiffs’ trademark ‘ACAL' without the Plaintiffs’ authority or consent.
LexBlog IP
JUNE 28, 2023
Accordingly, the Court held that the holder of the IP right to a computer program cannot object to the resale of a copy thereof where such a copy is accompanied by a licence for unlimited use, whether material or immaterial. The Court made specific reference to certain European Court of Justice decisions in this respect. (3)
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
In this context, the BGH issued a decision in 2014 in relation to the games console, Nintendo DS. According to the BGH, the specific design of the cards and consoles manufactured by the plaintiff constituted effective technical measures within the meaning of Section 95a (2) and (3) No.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
MARCH 21, 2023
The narrow permitted uses, consisting of making copies for digitisation purposes and disseminating online via non-commercial websites are problematic. The OWD and the CDSM Directive’s OOCW provisions now coexist as two distinct options that cultural heritage institutions can rely on for clearing rights.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
This first part covers the definition of a work, authorship and moral rights. Parts 2 to 4 will address exploitation rights, related rights, exceptions and limitations, copyright contract law and enforcement. 3] BGH, 18 September 2014, CT-Paradies, GRUR 2015, 258. [4] 2] BGH, 16 April 2015, GRUR 2015, 1189. [3]
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
145 
Let's personalize your content