Remove 2014 Remove Invention Remove Licensing Remove Patent Law
article thumbnail

Patent Law at the Supreme Court February 2022

Patently-O

The settlement also included a license to thousands of Qualcomm patents. Here’s the problem — in its appeal, Apple was not able to show Apple’s rights or duties under the license would change if the patents were cancelled. Basically, the patentee failed to disclose pre-filing sales of the invention.

article thumbnail

Decoding The Scepticism Of Overlap Between Patents Law And Competition Law

IP and Legal Filings

In the fast growing economy, innovation is necessary for businesses and Patents as an intellectual property rights protects that innovation. Intellectual property rights provide a negative right in other words a monopoly right to the creator or Inventor over their creation or Invention. C) 464/2014 decided on 30.03.2016. [6]

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Denies Cert in Thaler – The Thorny Issue of AI Inventorship

LexBlog IP

The Supreme Court yesterday declined to hear a case brought by a computer scientist whose “invention” was in fact created by artificial intelligence. Stephen Thaler was appealing a Federal Circuit decision that interpreted the Patent Act to require a human “inventor” for purposes of obtaining a patent.

article thumbnail

EFTA-India Free Trade Agreement and Patents Rules Amendment: Compromising Public Accountability and Transparency in the Indian Patent System

SpicyIP

Article 12, along with the recent amendments to the Patent Rules, restrict the obligation to disclose the “working” statement., This could make it harder to force companies to license patents if they are not being used to make affordable products in India. And further restricting policy levers such as compulsory licensing.

Patent 72
article thumbnail

Knowledge of a True Name brings Magical Power — but is it Patent Eligible?

Patently-O

See Resorbing Patent Law’s Kessler Cat into the General Law of Preclusion. The new petition focuses on eligibility and asks the Supreme Court to reaffirm two separate pathways for computer-implemented business method inventions: Improving “the functioning of the computer itself;” and/or.

Patent 58
article thumbnail

Definiteness: Federal Circuit’s Pliable Standard Results in Resilient Patent Claims

Patently-O

In Niazi Licensing Corp. 898 (2014). Patent law’s definiteness requirement is derived from the requirement that patent claims “particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter” of the invention. Jude Medical S.C., ” Nautilus, Inc. Biosig Instruments, Inc. ,

Patent 83
article thumbnail

From Saving the World to Fighting Over IP: Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech

The IP Law Blog

and the wealthy countries, Moderna announced that it expected its competitors to respect Moderna’s intellectual property and that it would offer patent licenses on reasonable terms to those who asked. On August 26, 2022, Moderna sued Pfizer and BioNTech for patent infringement in the district court in Massachusetts.

IP 52