Remove 2014 Remove Inventor Remove Litigation Remove Patent Infringement
article thumbnail

Inventor Asks SCOTUS to Consider Patent Eligibility Again, Distinguishing Case from American Axle

IP Watchdog

Neapco just a few days earlier, inventor David Tropp on July 5 again asked the Court to unravel U.S. patent eligibility law. 208 (2014).”. Despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection of the petition in American Axle v. 101, as interpreted in Alice Corporation Pty v. 101, as interpreted in Alice Corporation Pty v.

Inventor 113
article thumbnail

Jump Rope Company Asks High Court to Weigh in on CAFC Approach to Collateral Estoppel for PTAB Invalidations

IP Watchdog

The inventor of a novel jump rope system (the Revolution Rope), Molly Metz, is petitioning the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to bar a patent infringement suit in district court where the CAFC has affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) finding of unpatentability. 191 (2014); and Grogan v.

Inventor 109
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Keeping up with Belgian patent litigation: Year case law review 2021

The IPKat

The winds of a busy Belgian court term blows through the IPKat's wild ancestor's mane (c) Christopher Stothers 'Tis the season for a look at the cases that were in 2021 from around Europe and what they mean for the IP litigation themes in those jurisdictions now that the dust has settled in 2022. The decisions we (arbitrarily!)

article thumbnail

Safe Skies Eligibility Petition

Patently-O

David Tropp sued Travel Sentry for patent infringement back in 2006. That was the same year that I first taught a patent law class. Back then, eligibility was almost an unknown concept in patent litigation. 208 (2014). 101, as interpreted in Alice Corp Pty v. CLS Bank Int’l , 573 U.S. Tropp Petition.

article thumbnail

Attorneys Adam Shartzer and Josh Carrigan Author Law360 Expert Analysis “Patent Fee-Shifting Often Leaves Prevailing Parties Unpaid”

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Principal Adam Shartzer and Associate Josh Carrigan authored Expert Analysis for Law360 examining a fee-shifting statute for patent cases that allows prevailing parties to recover their reasonable attorney fees in exceptional patent infringement cases. Supreme Court’s 2014 Octane Fitness LLC v. Since the U.S.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

Inventorship Correction Affirmed for Patent on Intermodal Container for Transporting Gaseous Fluids

Patently-O

The patent at issue, originally naming a single inventor (Steve Campbell), claims a lightweight intermodal container system for transporting refrigerated gaseous fluids. 256 to correct inventorship on an issued patent. 663 (2014). Tube-Mac Indus., Campbell , No. 2022-2170 (Fed. Iolab Corp. , 3d 1344 (Fed.

Patent 59
article thumbnail

The Changing Shape of Trade Secret Trials: An Increasing Shift to Juries and What that Means for Trade Secret Owners and their Lawyers (Part II)

LexBlog IP

Supreme Court have eroded the protection previously afforded by patents, particularly in the software industry. 2d 296 (2014) and Mayo Collaborative Servs. 2021), which held that an artificial intelligence machine cannot qualify as an inventor under the Patent Act). See Alice Corp. CLS Bank Int’l , 573 U.S.