article thumbnail

Another Drop in the Bucket: Delhi High Court’s Interim Injunction Denial for Vifor in FCM Patent Infringement

SpicyIP

Adding another leaf to the FCM patent litigation saga, the Delhi High Court on September 19 refused to grant an interim injunction to Vifor considering the launch of the Biological E’s product in the market. In defense, the defendants raised the court’s observations in the 2014 Vifor (International) Ltd v.

article thumbnail

Jump Rope Company Asks High Court to Weigh in on CAFC Approach to Collateral Estoppel for PTAB Invalidations

IP Watchdog

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to bar a patent infringement suit in district court where the CAFC has affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) finding of unpatentability. 191 (2014); and Grogan v. Jump Rope Systems is arguing that the CAFC’s decision in XY, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, L.C.

Inventor 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Analysis of February 2024 Delhi High Court Judgment in InterDigital v. Oppo – I

SpicyIP

Background The Petitioner, InterDigital (“ID”), initiated patent infringement proceedings against Oppo, One Plus and Redme (“defendants”) concerning 8 standard essential patents. These patents concern wireless communication technology standards (IN 262910, 295912, 313036, 319673, 320182) and H.265

article thumbnail

CAFC Distinguishes Forum Selection Clause Language from Precedential Cases in Win for Abbott

IP Watchdog

entered into a settlement and license agreement in 2014, following years of patent litigation over their competing glucose monitoring system patents. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential ruling that affirmed a district court’s denial of preliminary injunction to DexCom, Inc.,

article thumbnail

Third Circuit Allows Deduction of Generic Hatch-Waxman Defense Costs

Patently-O

July 27, 2023) In a recent tax appeal, the Third Circuit court of appeals afformed that legal expenses incurred by generic drug makers to defend against patent infringement suits brought under the Hatch-Waxman Act are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses. Urquhart v. Commissioner , 215 F.2d 2d 17, 19 (3d Cir.

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Reverses Claim Preclusion-Based Dismissal of Induced Infringement Suit

IP Watchdog

ST has been involved in litigation with “bull stud” company, ABS Global, Inc., since 2014. 8,206,987, owned by Inguran, LLC and directed to “a method for sorting bull sperm cells according to a specific DNA characteristic in order to preselect the gender of a domestic animal’s offspring,” according to the opinion.

article thumbnail

Idaho AG Wasden Moves to Intervene Against Alleged Patent Trolls

JD Supra Law

Idaho AG Lawrence Wasden has filed motions to intervene [Law360 paywall] in two related patent lawsuits.