2015 Designs Licensing Settlement 
Copyright Lately
AUGUST 22, 2021
Liebowitz is probably the best known example of a copyright troll, a moniker that one circuit court defined as a someone who brings “strategic infringement claims of dubious merit in the hope of arranging prompt settlements with defendants who would prefer to pay modest or nuisance settlements rather than be tied up in expensive litigation.”.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 24, 2022
20-1394 (CVSG requested October 4, 2021); Undermining Jury Decisions : Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. The settlement also included a license to thousands of Qualcomm patents. And, although the license is set to expire before the patents, the court found that potential future infringement to be too speculative. Patreon, Inc.,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SpicyIP
MARCH 11, 2024
Calm Water Therapeutics Llc vs The Assistant Controller Of Patents And Designs on 28 February, 2024 (Delhi High Court) The appeal challenged the rejection of a patent application for a “Bi-Functional Co-Polymer” by the Assistant Controller of Patents.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
FEBRUARY 4, 2021
The biosimilar pathway was designed to increase competition for biologics and reduce healthcare costs. For the first time since FDA licensed the first biosimilar, Sandoz’s Zarxio ® (filgrastim-sndz), in 2015, the United States saw a decrease in annual biosimilar approvals in 2020. No earlier than July 31, 2023 per settlement.
Copyright Lately
OCTOBER 24, 2022
This prompted a quick settlement which allowed the chair to remain in the picture. I also recognize that there are lots of situations in which a set designer may want to use a specific copyrighted work that needs to be cleared. A still from 12 Monkeys (left) and Lebbeus Woods’ “Neomechanical Tower (Upper) Chamber.”
LexBlog IP
APRIL 3, 2023
This is an important decision to review in understanding licensing and litigation of international SEP portfolios. This decision indicates that a FRAND commitment is not a one-way street, but imposes obligations on both the SEP owner and someone seeking to license the SEP. This decision indicates they should.
The IP Law Blog
MARCH 2, 2021
The issue arose from a dispute between Romag, a manufacturer of magnetic snap fasteners for leather goods, and Fossil, a designer and distributor of a wide range of fashion accessories. When settlement discussions proved fruitless, Romag sued. To support an indemnity provision, requiring insurance, and even requiring that the U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
87 
Let's personalize your content