Indiana Intellectual Property Law

DECEMBER 23, 2022

Registration No. Registration Date. January 6, 2015. is not an authorized Gema distributor and upon information and belief, does not sell “new” Gema products but rather sells knocks-offs using the Gema Trademarks without authorization. OPTISELECT. OPTISELECT. May 16, 2017. September 14, 2004. April 29, 2008.

Trademark 52

Trademark False Advertising Patent Registration 52

Kashishipr

JULY 20, 2022

Hydrox was largely discontinued in 1999, and it was in September 2015 when the product was reintroduced by Leaf Brands. In this scenario, the bigger company usually uses its superior distribution and promotional capabilities, as a result of which the smaller company helplessly sees its business slipping away.

Branding 52

Branding Brands Branding Marketing 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 17, 2023

Ankit Sahni’s AI “Co-authored” Artwork Denied Registration by US, Continues to be Registered in India Can AI (co)author art? US Copyright Office says no to “RAGHAV”s work, even as the same work remains registered as a copyright in India. The last date for submission of entries is February 29, 2024. and Ors. ,

IP 59

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 59

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 8, 2023

student at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She is keenly interested in Intellectual Property Law, Technology Law, and Corporate Law. British Sky Broadcasting Group (2015), considering the “customer base” in a jurisdiction rather than a “physical place of business”.

Technology 59

Technology Trademark Business Branding 59

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

That question is “how have various countries’ intellectual property laws addressed efforts to copyright, trademark, or patent holy names, sacred words, or outputs of creation?” registered trademarks: Elohim—4. But that “provision only restricts registration of the mark.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 21, 2023

So watch the docket to see how this case plays out, and to see how it impacts the concept of the registration of historic figure trademarks. Additionally, issues can arise when one claims trademark rights connected to historic landmarks, as Justin Hughes discussed at length in the Wake Forest Law Review. .”)

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Trademark Law Law 52