article thumbnail

Copyright case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof 2015 – 2019 – Part 1 of 4: Definition of a work, authorship and moral rights

Kluwer Copyright Blog

This first part covers the definition of a work, authorship and moral rights. Parts 2 to 4 will address exploitation rights, related rights, exceptions and limitations, copyright contract law and enforcement. Moral rights (Sections 12-14 UrhG). 2] BGH, 16 April 2015, GRUR 2015, 1189. [3]

article thumbnail

The Modern Copyright Dilemma: Digital Content Ownership and Access

IP and Legal Filings

Unlike USA, India’s Copyright law does not have wider fair dealing provisions along with those which addresses to the problems emerging due to the technological advancements and modern-day requirements (Bhardwaj, 2016). Rameshwari Photocopy Services & Anr, 2016). These rights are transferrable for financial benefits.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Maasai Fashion: Indigenous People Vs Corporates

IP and Legal Filings

Jaguar Land Rover had used the imagery of the Maasai community to enhance the aesthetics of their advertisement. Hence, it is unethical to use Maasai imagery for the sake of free advertisements or cultural misappropriation. A shoe company called Masai Barefoot Technology as well used Maasai iconography while launching their brand.

article thumbnail

Copyright case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof 2015 – 2019 – Part 4 of 4: Copyright contract law and enforcement

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Travel costs which a journalist incurs in the course of their research do not fall within the scope of application of Section 32 UrhG, but merely remuneration for the use of rights. The infringement at trial was a photo of a sportscar illegally used on the internet for advertising purposes. Collecting Societies.

article thumbnail

Journey Through “Novembers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

He also discussed the ‘license of rights’ system for GM patents in light of “Licensing and Formats for GM Technology Agreements Guidelines, 2016” (see also ). Interestingly, before Bachchan’s issue, Suchita elaborated on the status of personality rights in India against the backdrop of claims of the wife of the late Steve Irwin.

article thumbnail

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

JIPL Online

If memes are so powerful to engage users with the underlying content, as recognized by their increased use as an advertising tool, then how can the same corporations claim that memes are creating a serious harm that the law should recognize and protect? 139 (2016). [ix] Zywicki & Thomas J. vii] Deidrè A. 511, 523 (2012).

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The judgement was passed collectively in an appeal against 4 orders (two impugning the 2016 Ericsson v. Controller General of Patents and Designs (passed on September 15), the Court clarified that the 2016 CRI Guidelines’ requirement of assessing the CRI in conjunction with novel hardware has now been removed from the 2017 CRI Guidelines.

IP 124