Remove 2016 Remove Inventor Remove Licensing Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

When is an IP agreement between a university and a student inventor unfair?

The IPKat

In 2016, ONI licensed the Nanoimager from the University, whereby the University received royalties on ONI’s sales of the Nanoimager based on the terms of the IP Provisions. Though this part of the judgement was heavily focused on contract law, some significant points regarding student inventors were determined. But unfair?

article thumbnail

The US’ Review of March-in Rights, and Some Questions on an Indian Counterpart

SpicyIP

March-in rights are provisions that allow the government to require a license for inventions stemming from this investment, upon the fulfilment of certain conditions. The purpose of this right is to enable the government to fully realise the potential of the public-funded IPR in question if it is being underutilised by the inventor institute.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

2021 IP Year in Review

IPilogue

Copyright Ownership of Movies and Films in Canada: Who’s on First? of the Patent Act on June 24, 2016. Continued Debates over AI as an Inventor. Around the world, patent registrars grappled with patent applications that credit artificial intelligence software as the inventor. Giuseppina D’Agostino. By Meena Alnajar.

IP 106
article thumbnail

National Intellectual Property Rights Conference 2023 – Day 1

Intepat

Key takeaways encompassed the illumination of India’s thriving innovation ecosystem, the accentuation of dialogues within the WIPO Tech Access Platform on voluntary licensing arrangements, and the recognition of India’s ambitions to revamp its IP framework for more efficiency.

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Tools for Protecting Fashion Goods

LexBlog IP

Fashion companies should be aware that they may need to obtain a license to, or ownership of, the copyright from the photographer. Although the copyright process is fairly inexpensive and simple, fashion companies should take extra care as to not be copyright infringers themselves. Peters , 488 F.3d 3d 277 (4th Cir. 2] See 17 U.S.C. §§

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Tools for Protecting Fashion Goods

Above the Fold

Fashion companies should be aware that they may need to obtain a license to, or ownership of, the copyright from the photographer. Although the copyright process is fairly inexpensive and simple, fashion companies should take extra care as to not be copyright infringers themselves. 102(a)(5); see also Darden v. Peters , 488 F.3d

article thumbnail

Schemes, Policies And Programmes For Patent Facilitation

IIPRD

Some of these schemes and programs work with the assistance of professional IP practitioners who are empaneled in respective departments, programs, or schemes while others provide monetary assistance to start-ups, inventors, institutions, etc. IP commercialization, technology transfer & licensing. Startup Policy 2016-21.