IP and Legal Filings

SEPTEMBER 12, 2022

Cooper case, a work does not have to be entirely unique in order to be protected by copyright; rather, there needs to be some effort put into it and it cannot be a carbon copy of another person’s work. The lack of organisation and ambiguity make the protection problematic even if the work is copyrighted.

Art 52

Art Copyright Artistic Work Public Domain 52

The IPKat

OCTOBER 15, 2023

Background Both the Claimant and Respondent sold dining tables. The Claimant launched its dining table in 2018 as part of its ‘Palais Royal’ furniture collection, which also won numerous awards. The Respondent submitted that the Palais Royal dining table would not be protected by copyright since it is not sufficiently original.

Art 91

Art Designs Design Marketing 91

IP Whiteboard

JULY 19, 2020

On 27 April 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States ( Supreme Court ) handed down its decision in Georgia Et Al v Public Resource Org, Inc. The Supreme Court held that works authored by legislators in their legislative capacity were ineligible for copyright protection. reasons given by a judge. reasons given by a judge.

Copyright 52

Copyright Law Government Public Domain 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 11, 2021

In the wake of the 2020 Lukis v. For example, if a third-party poster copies a newspaper article and posts it to their social media page, the court implies that the social media service can never assert Section 230 protection for that article–even if the third-party poster isn’t infringing copyright because of, say, fair use.

Advertising 90

Advertising Advertising Social Media Blogging 90

IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 20, 2023

Introduction Any literally or artistic work that is original and creative i.e.; not copied from anywhere by the owner is protected under Copyright Act, 1957. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp The post Conundrum Involving The Ownership Of The Work Created By Ai first appeared on IPLF. 1996) 38 DRJ 81 (India). [2]

Ownership 61

Ownership Moral Rights Public Domain Intellectual Property 61

SpicyIP

MARCH 11, 2024

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant’s use of “Café Social” for its restaurant in Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh infringes its trademark as it copied the “Social” word mark and the plaintiff’s distinctive artwork representing its trademark. Dr Reddy S Laboratories Limited vs Neutec Healthcare Pvt.

Trademark 59

Trademark Registration Copyright Patent 59

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 21, 2023

The word ‘copyright’ in its simplest sense is an amalgamation of the two words ‘copy’ and ‘right’ which leads to the meaning— ‘right to copy’. The section 2(c) of the 1957 Copyright Act of India defines ‘artistic work’ as any work that includes engraving, sculpture, painting, or a photograph. In Alexander v.

Copyright 52

Copyright Artistic Work Copyright Infringement Ownership 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 21, 2023

The word ‘ copyright ’ in its simplest sense is an amalgamation of the two words ‘copy’ and ‘right’ which leads to the meaning— ‘right to copy’. The section 2(c) of the 1957 Copyright Act of India defines ‘artistic work’ as any work that includes engraving, sculpture, painting, or a photograph. In Alexander v.

Artistic Work 52

Artistic Work Ownership Copyright Infringement Copyright 52

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 1, 2023

[i] The very first accords to recognise why IPRs are important were the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883) and the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886). Both agreements are governed by the World Intellectual Property Organization. iv] Sameer Wadekar & Anr.

Intellectual Property 70

Intellectual Property IP Government Invention 70

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work. 103(a) (“protection for a work employing preexisting material in which copyright subsists does not extend to any part of the work in which such material has been used unlawfully.”). In the first, Sony Corp.

Fair Use 95

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 95

SpicyIP

MAY 6, 2024

vs Prerna Rajpal Trading As The Amaris Flagship Store on 29 April, 2024 (Delhi High Court) The dispute is over copying substantial elements like placement, pattern, color combination of plaintiff’s Serpenti Ocean Treasure Necklace by the defendant’s Shield-It Necklace. Bulgari S.P.A

Trademark 59

Trademark Invention Licensing Patent 59

IP Whiteboard

JUNE 7, 2021

You then upload a copy of the digital work that you want to represent in NFT-form to the NFT marketplace, pay a transaction fee and click ‘create’. It’s hard to identify and verify the true owner of content when an identical copy of that content can be created with a few clicks of a mouse. What are the benefits of NFTs?

Non-Fungible Tokens 40

Non-Fungible Tokens IP Cease and Desist Ownership 40

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 5, 2022

PDF copy available. IP includes any creation of the mind, including inventions, literary and artistic works, symbols, names, images, and designs, and various forms of IP protection cover these different categories. The lithium-ion battery, introduced commercially in 1991, revolutionized the consumer electronics industry.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Technology Journalism IP 52