2021 Copyright Infringement Designs Related Rights 
The IPKat
JANUARY 30, 2022
Here they are in case you missed them: TRADE MARKS Katfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 3, 2023
” However, Wallshoppe does not allege Defendant knew of the specific acts of infringement at issue here—Sienna Lewis selling products featuring the Palm Design on Defendant’s website. Jury awards nearly $50M in damages against Internet access provider for user-caused copyright infringement. Buzzfeed, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
JANUARY 21, 2022
The book covers the rights of performers, particularly the rights conferred under Part II of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended). Those working in the field of media and entertainment law will no doubt be familiar with Arnold's authorial text on Performer's Rights.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 2, 2023
In 2021, OpenAI’s Dall·E was able to create images in response to text prompts, including those combining unrelated concepts (such as “a snail made of harp”), but the results were merely competent in artistic terms. Generative AI Computer-generated art reached a tipping point in 2022.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JANUARY 9, 2023
have grappled with how broadly or narrowly to interpret the concept of transformativeness when assessing fair use defenses to charges of copyright infringement… In seeking Supreme Court review, the [Andy Warhol] Foundation argued that the Goldsmith decision was inconsistent with the Court’s teachings in Campbell and Google. .
The IPKat
OCTOBER 4, 2022
its pattern, trade mark or design) to determine whether it is genuine or counterfeit. This issue has also raised the question of how to strike the right balance between the respective interests and rights of intellectual property owners on the one hand and amateur creators, users and content sharing services on the other.
LexBlog IP
JUNE 28, 2023
This prevents the possible infringement of the exclusive right to reproduce a computer program provided for in article 42(2) of the Copyright Law, which belongs to the creator or author of the relevant program. 2790/2021; and Court of Appeals of Thessaloniki decision No. 766/2021; No. 1483/2021; and No.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
76 
Let's personalize your content