article thumbnail

dissatisfaction w/Amazon's partner program isn't TM infringement/false advertising

43(B)log

2022 WL 670919, NO. 7, 2022) Melwani owns the Royal Silk trademark for “a wide variety of products.” T]he URL merely shows how the website’s data is organized and/or the search term entered by the consumer, and … this does not violate trademark law.” False designation of origin/false advertising: Lasoff v.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Troia , 2022 WL 3544170 (S.D.N.Y. 2022 WL 3647817 (E.D. Jargon Watch: The court describes competitive keyword advertising as “keyword conquesting.” The post Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet Troia appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Top Trademark Trends of 2022

Erik K Pelton

The year saw many trademark stories in the news as backlogs continued at the USPTO even while application filing numbers dropped from their all time highs during the two previous years. Here are the biggest trademark stories of 2022 that we have been following at EMP&A. Trademark Scams. © 2022 Erik M.

Trademark 130
article thumbnail

truthful statement about role in developing product isn't falsified by later split

43(B)log

2:21-cv-830-SPC-MRM, 2022 WL 1187136 (M.D. 21, 2022) “Nearly twenty years ago, Plaintiff Dr. Andrew Hawrych, a plastic surgeon, and Defendant Peter Von Berg, a businessman operating a cosmetics and skin care company, formed an oral agreement to develop new cosmetic products.” Thus, the false advertising claim would be dismissed.

article thumbnail

dismissal of ASU's claim against ASU_covid.parties Instagram upheld

43(B)log

Doe, 2022 WL 1514649, No. May 13, 2022) I wrote an amicus brief in this case. To the extent [the Board’s] appeal attempts to improperly use trademark laws to block the expression of negative views about the university and its administration, such efforts fail.” Arizona Bd. of Regents v. 21-16525 (9th Cir.

article thumbnail

using an ITU to get non-Amazon platforms to take down competitors

43(B)log

2:21-cv-07929-MEMF(PVCx), 2022 WL 18674459 (C.D. 22, 2022) This is a super messy case with a lot going on; I’m going to blog about it mainly to highlight a new thing you can apparently do with a trademark application , which is use it on non-Amazon platforms to gain advantages. Hollywood Unlocked, Inc.,

article thumbnail

Georgia Supreme Court Blesses Google’s Keyword Ad Sales–Edible IP v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

.” In other words, they sought to establish (using centuries-old chattel-based theft doctrines rather than trademark law) that a trademark owner has the unrestricted right to shut down anyone using their trademarks, even if no consumers are harmed. to see if it could find some soft spot in Georgia state law.

IP 126