article thumbnail

court remands NYC's false advertising case against oil companies to state court

43(B)log

Here, the city successfully wins remand (and a fee award) in this opinion rejecting removal of its false advertising suit against Exxon, other fossil fuel companies, and their top trade association for violations of New York City’s Consumer Protection Law. 2023), the court understandably refuses to distinguish it.

article thumbnail

plaintiff has standing to seek injunctive relief against allegedly falsely advertised penile implant

43(B)log

2:22-cv-03391-SSS-PLAx, 2023 WL 5667568 (C.D. 17, 2023) Plaintiff brought the usual California statutory claims against Penuma, a penile implant/procedure, for alleged misstatements about Penuma’s safety and efficacy. International Medical Devices, Inc., Here, we deal only with the claims for injunctive relief.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

alleged misrepresentation of partnership/approval suffices for false advertising claim

43(B)log

2023 WL 8586681, No. 8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into false advertising cases? The screenshot was “commercial advertising or promotion.” Faire Wholesale, Inc. Tundra, Inc., 23-cv-02538-JSC (N.D. Faire operates an online marketplace connecting wholesalers with retailers.

article thumbnail

False advertising and TM infringement receive very different damages treatment: case in point

43(B)log

19-662-CFC, 2023 WL 4561059 (D. 17, 2023) Another entry in the “courts treat Lanham Act false advertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisions” line. CareDx sued Natera for false advertising. Natera, Inc., It also found that CareDx was entitled to $21.2

article thumbnail

False Advertising: Verifiably False Versus Subjective Opinion

JD Supra Law

In a case originally based on a false advertising claim under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded the district court’s dismissal of the claim. June 2, 2023) (Clifton, Bumatay, By: McDermott Will & Emery Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v.

article thumbnail

False patent marking claims survive even when Dastar bars false advertising claims based on "innovation"

43(B)log

30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act false advertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. 11, 2023 (claiming that various products were “patented”). 1, 2017 to Apr.

article thumbnail

putting a label on a product you produce isn't direct false advertising, but could be direct false association

43(B)log

Meadow Gold Dairies Hawaii, LLC, 2023 WL 159907, No. 11, 2023) Plaintiff alleged that defendant MGD advertises and sells milk that is one hundred percent from cows outside of Hawai‘i. Was a false geographic origin claim one for false association, § 1125(a)(1)(A), or false advertising, § 1125(a)(1)(B)?