Remove 2024 Remove Designs Remove Registration Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

2024 Changes to International Trademark Classifications

LexBlog IP

2024 Changes to International Trademark Classifications by Melanie Lane Understanding WIPO’s 2024 Nice Classification Changes: Impact on the USPTO’s §6.1 of 37 CFR Part 6, aligning it with the 12th edition, version 2024, of the Nice Classification published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

article thumbnail

Trade Mark Restrictions: The Limit of Monopoly on Common English Words

IP and Legal Filings

ABSTTRACT The constraints placed on trademark registration, particularly concerning common English words by recent judicial review by Justice C. INTRODUCTION For consumer identification and brand protection a crucial mechanism is important which is served by trade mark law.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

TTABlog Quarterly Index: April - June 2023

The TTABlog

TTABlog Test: Is CLAIM WATCHER Confusable With CLAIM WATCH & Design for Certain Insurance Claim Services? [No] TTABlog Test: Is "K2 MOTORCARS & Design" Confusable With "K2 MOTOR & Design" For Automobile-Related Services? [No] No] TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Was/Were Dismissed?

article thumbnail

Trademark Tussle: Blenders Pride vs. London Pride – A Legal Saga Unraveled

IP and Legal Filings

The trademark Blenders Pride was adopted in 1973 by plaintiffs and was registered in favour of Seagram’s Company Limited, which is house mark of plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have obtained registration in respect of their trademark in Class-33. The plaintiffs have objected that defendant is imitating their trades marks.

article thumbnail

The Supreme Court Limits the Extraterritorial Reach of the Lanham Act

LexBlog IP

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court adopted a restrictive view of the extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act, holding that federal trademark law cannot support a claim for trademark infringement against solely foreign conduct. The case is Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc. Read the opinion here.

article thumbnail

4th Circuit Upholds District Court and TTAB: Timberland Boot Design Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness

The TTABlog

April 15, 2024). Citing Wal-Mart , the court observed that trademark law does not protect "product designs that lack distinctive meaning as a source identifier." That same principle applies to trademark registration. Welch 2024. TBL Licensing v. Vidal , Appeal No. 23-1150 (4th Cir.

Designs 62
article thumbnail

Legislative Oversight? Addressing the High Court Jurisdiction Vacuum Post-IPAB vis-a-vis Cancellation Petitions under the Trademark Act

SpicyIP

Gian Chand Jain was dealing with a similar issue since in the Design Act, 1911, the Act didn’t define which High Court would have jurisdiction. the High Court would have jurisdiction if the effect of the registration is felt within the territorial jurisdiction).This Afterall, the trademark act is a self contained code.

Trademark 105