Advertising Copying Marketing Settlement 
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
NOVEMBER 28, 2022
To many trademark owners, it’s a simple decision to sue when the advertiser includes the trademark in the ad copy. To many trademark owners, it’s a simple decision to sue when the advertiser includes the trademark in the ad copy. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. None of the clicks led to sales.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 9, 2022
Also, there should not be a “use in commerce” when the advertiser (here, Troia) doesn’t actually offer any goods or services in the marketplace. And how can consumers be “diverted” with the ad copy accurately previewed what consumers could expect to get at the link terminus? That’s what gripers do.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
TorrentFreak
JULY 9, 2022
Several of these lawsuits have ended in settlements, where some VPNs services agreed to block notorious pirate sites or BitTorrent traffic on US-based servers. While not all VPN services are bad apples, VeePN is allegedly using pirates’ fear of getting caught as a marketing strategy.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 30, 2023
This is a competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. This is fine, but it deviates from courts’ efforts over the years to come up with multi-factor variations specific to keyword advertising. ” Marketing channel. Note: if it’s not obvious, “CE” is an abbreviation for “continuing education.”
43(B)log
JANUARY 19, 2022
14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a false advertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/social media (consumers) and social advertising markets.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 8, 2024
This is a case involving a trademark owner and a competitive keyword advertiser. That’s certainly true for high-profile and well-advertised consumer items like fast food chains, mass-market phones, and major car labels, but is it true in this particular niche? However, the results are consistent with each other.
43(B)log
AUGUST 22, 2022
18, 2022) Not bound by Article III, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling despite the parties’ settlement. The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
102 
Let's personalize your content