Advertising Copyright False Advertising Settlement 
43(B)log
AUGUST 22, 2022
18, 2022) Not bound by Article III, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling despite the parties’ settlement. The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’”
43(B)log
MARCH 28, 2024
26, 2024) Defendant, d/b/a Wonderland, operated an adult entertainment club and was one of the many such sued by various models for using their images in advertising without their consent from 2015 to 2019. Princeton then sued Wonderland and the models, seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no obligations under the Consent Judgment.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
DECEMBER 16, 2022
15, 2022) The court of appeals reversed summary judgment in favor of an insurer, and ordered partial summary judgment for the insured, on the duty to defend in underlying litigation based on advertising injury coverage for trade dress infringement (depicting allegedly infringing products) in the insured’s advertising.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 26, 2022
I’ve often wondered about the conversations that take place between trademark owner and counsel before filing a keyword advertising lawsuit. Gibson is remembered to this day for his Righthaven copyright litigation scheme (against mom-and-pop bloggers!), More Posts About Keyword Advertising. * Should we say ? Greenberg v.
The IPKat
MARCH 7, 2024
The Case of Upcycling”, Irene Calboli and Siroos Tanner address the IP dimension of upcycling and explore ways to prevent this environmentally friendly practice from being hindered by claims of potential trademark and copyright infringement. centred perspective, it — unsurprisingly —managed to grasp the essence of the topic globally.
43(B)log
NOVEMBER 27, 2023
MillerKing, a small Chicago law firm that claims to be a direct competitor of DNP, sued DNP for false association and false advertising under the Lanham Act and Illinois state law. (The DNP advertises that it uses artificial intelligence” rather than “human knowledge.” But DNP isn’t actually licensed to practice law.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
There’s also a copyright claim for Luxy copying the plaintiff’s TOS/privacy policy. Plus, does this mean that rival apps can’t advertise themselves as rivals or engage in comparative advertising because the app stores aren’t properly labeling the ads, even if the advertisers are engaging in nominative use?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content