article thumbnail

Unearthing the Truth: How Ambiguity Excavated a Win in False Advertising Claim

JD Supra Law

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit was tasked with excavating the truth behind claims of false advertising and copyright infringement.

article thumbnail

no disgorgement under state law when false advertising wasn't shown to result in sales

43(B)log

Republic alleged that HBI, its competitor in the tobacco rolling paper industry, engaged in false advertising under the Lanham Act, unfair competition, and violations of the IUDTPA. HBI counterclaimed that Republic infringed its copyrights and trade dress. There was no special verdict form.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

California Supreme Court reaffirms strict liability for false advertising in Serova

43(B)log

The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault false advertising laws. There was also no copyright preemption.

article thumbnail

copying competitor's website & reviews creates (c), TM, false advertising problems

43(B)log

Boston Suburban allegedly continued to use the “Logan Car Service” mark in online keyword advertising and in metatags, and continued to copy customer reviews from Boston Carriage’s website and publish them on online review platforms.

article thumbnail

Using dominant competitor's part names/numbers for comparison isn't false advertising, TM infringement, or (c) infringement

43(B)log

15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its false advertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It

article thumbnail

seller's online arbitrage exposes it to (c) and false advertising claims

43(B)log

This is easier when there’s a potential copyright claim (which is not subject to §113(c), which very few people remember). She publishes photos of her products on eBay, and has registered some copyrights in the photos. She publishes photos of her products on eBay, and has registered some copyrights in the photos.

article thumbnail

Amazon escapes liability for its Brand Registry advertising

43(B)log

Amazon’s Brand Registry advertises “Automated Protections” that are “[p]owered by Amazon’s Machine Learning.” False advertising, Lei defendants: The complaint didn’t explain how “designed in the United States but … manufactured in China” was materially deceptive and thus didn’t meet FRCP 9(b) pleading standards.