Article Intellectual Property Law IP Moral Rights 
The IPKat
DECEMBER 12, 2023
Yu) to explore the future of their fields within intellectual property. Each author was asked by the editors to discuss an area of reform in IP that they deemed a priority in relation to the public good. The editors describe the collection as a happily diverse mosaic of the future of IP. Yes, three!
The IPKat
MAY 25, 2022
As IP aficionados, many readers of this blog will have strong views about the proper scope of copyright law. Can and should those beliefs be protected under the Equality Act 2010, protecting copyright believers against discrimination in employment law and in the exercise by public authorities in their functions?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Intepat
DECEMBER 12, 2021
This article will discuss a topic related to the complex subject of “food plating” and how it is protected under copyright law. The quick analysis reveals that copyrighting food plating is a reasonable option, given the conditions for obtaining copyright under Indian law.
IP and Legal Filings
JANUARY 22, 2024
Introduction The Intellectual property laws are designed in such a way that not only reward the creator of his intellectual creation thereby incentivising other creators for further innovation, while balancing the rights of the creator with the right of the society to access information or knowledge.
IP and Legal Filings
FEBRUARY 20, 2024
Protecting personality rights has become a growing problem in India due to deepfakes, morphed pictures, etc. In between these problems came Delhi High Court’s judgement in favour of Anil Kapoor wanting to get personality rights. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention personality rights, In the case of Judge K.S.
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
xi] There are countless articles and marketing studies directing corporations on how to market via memes to reach the maximum level of engagement. My argument is that protection of the underlying content is irrelevant because the relative costs of enforcing these rights outweighs the benefits of protection. Zywicki & Thomas J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
These provisions served as, among other things, models for Articles 18 and 20 in the new DSM Copyright Directive (2019/790). The question as to whether the required serious infringement of moral rights had occurred could, the BGH ruled, only be ascertained on the basis of an analysis of the entire circumstances of the specific case.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
73 
Let's personalize your content