LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Clarifying Copyright Fair Use in Commercialized and Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from Warhol v. Goldsmith by Jaime Chandra Clarifying Fair Use in Commercialized & Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from the Warhol v. We’re talking about Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. Table of Contents: Warhol v.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Derivative Work 52

Copyright Lately

JANUARY 23, 2023

Instead, the lawsuit is premised upon a much more sweeping and bold assertion—namely that every image that’s output by these AI tools is necessarily an unlawful and infringing “derivative work” based on the billions of copyrighted images used to train the models. You’d be wrong. 17 U.S.C. §

Derivative Work 108

Derivative Work Art Copying Fair Use 108

IIPRD

APRIL 8, 2024

This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. 2] This shift i.e. from assisting work to generating it has taken the legal regime of IPR by a storm of confusion and questions.

Art 52

Art Artwork Intellectual Property Copyright Law 52

Patently-O

OCTOBER 11, 2022

On October 12, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the fair use copyright case of Andy Warhol Foundation, Inc. Andy Warhol admittedly used Lynn Goldmith’s copyrighted photographs of Prince as the basis for his set of sixteen silkscreens. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. , by Dennis Crouch. Goldsmith , Docket No.

Fair Use 134

Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work Art 134

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] The effect upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. [8] Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v.

Fair Use 130

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 130

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides that “fair use of a copyrighted work.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 26, 2023

’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides that “fair use of a copyrighted work.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JULY 16, 2023

Accordingly, this case is a useful example of how a court will: (1) assess the derivation requirement (of actual copying) of UK copyright; and, (2) as part of that, consider similarity between musical works for the purpose of copyright infringement.” by Pamela Samuelson “In March 2022 the U.S.

Blogging 52

Blogging Law IP Fair Use 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2023

AI-generated vocals are roiling the music industry , with platforms acting to take down infringing content. Authors and copyright holders are concern ed that generative AI tools are built on the unauthorized and unremunerated use of their works, while at the same time negatively impacting their livelihood.

Copyright 138

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Law 138

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

According to Miramax, the creation of the NFTs constituted copyright infringement because they were unauthorized derivative works of Pulp Fiction. [23] StockX asserted several affirmative defenses, including fair use and the first sale doctrine, claiming that Nike’s suit “threatens the legitimate use of NFTs.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Branding 52