IP Tech Blog

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. Unbeknownst to Ms.

Fair Use 57

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 57

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

A pair of copyright decisions issued in May, one involving the appropriation artist Richard Prince [1] and the other involving works portraying the musician known as Prince, explore and expand on the “fair use” defense to copyright infringement. On May 11, the U.S. 2] A week later, the U.S. 3] Graham v.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 24, 2022

Fair use and de minimis defenses are often unreliable, and even if you have a solid case, defending copyright infringement lawsuits is an expensive proposition. In 1997, the Second Circuit reversed the district court’s finding that BET made fair use of Faith Ringgold’s “Church Picnic Story” quilt.

Artwork 88

Artwork Copyright Infringement Copyright Art 88

Kluwer Copyright Blog

APRIL 22, 2024

That is, in an NFT there can be an underlying copy of a work of art –typically an image, photograph, piece of music, video or certain audiovisual content– that may be subject to copyright.

Copyright 121

Copyright Artwork Moral Rights Non-Fungible Tokens 121

LexBlog IP

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. ” Unbeknownst to Ms.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 52

JD Supra Law

JANUARY 30, 2023

Supreme Court heard arguments regarding whether pop artist Andy Warhol’s artwork made fair use of a photo of a music legend, Prince, in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. This case is important because it may provide additional guidance in the very murky area of transformative use under copyright law.

Social Media 97

Social Media Copyright Law Copyright Artwork 97

IP Law 360

MARCH 28, 2022

Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review the Second Circuit's decision that Andy Warhol's artwork didn't make fair use of a photo of music legend Prince, following a petition that argued that the high court needs to clarify a circuit split on what makes a work transformative.

Artwork 98

Artwork Fair Use Music Copyright 98

IP Law 360

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Supreme Court in a copyright dispute over whether Andy Warhol's artwork made fair use of a photo of music legend Prince. A trio of attorneys who have experience both in BigLaw and the federal government will be arguing before the U.S.

Artwork 75

Artwork Copyright Fair Use Music 75

IP Law 360

JUNE 10, 2022

Supreme Court to overturn the Second Circuit's ruling that found pop artist Andy Warhol's artwork didn't make fair use of a photo of music legend Prince, saying that the appeals court's "cramped" reading of what makes a work transformative will harm the art world and the creation of future works.

Artwork 75

Artwork Fair Use Copyright Music 75

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Clarifying Copyright Fair Use in Commercialized and Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from Warhol v. Goldsmith by Jaime Chandra Clarifying Fair Use in Commercialized & Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from the Warhol v. We’re talking about Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. Let’s dive in!

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Derivative Work 52

JD Supra Law

MARCH 29, 2022

21-869: This case concerns the scope of the Copyright Act’s fair use defense. The case arises from Andy Warhols’ artwork that utilized a photo of music legend Prince. Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith, No. By: Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Artwork 52

Artwork Fair Use Music Art 52

IIPRD

APRIL 8, 2024

This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. Stability AI, three artists filed a claim on the basis that their work was used by the AI to train the algorithm and use them in a transformative manner to create new work. [5]

Art 52

Art Artwork Intellectual Property Copyright Law 52

Dear Rich IP Blog

JANUARY 16, 2024

However, people who find abandoned artwork, manuscripts, and musical recordings can claim ownership of the physical objects. Distributors usually require an indemnity provision guaranteeing your rights to use all the material. Physical ownership of a work is not the same as copyright ownership.

Ownership 59

Ownership Fair Use Copyright Artwork 59

Erik K Pelton

DECEMBER 20, 2022

which will determine the scope of the Lanham Act as applied to trademark infringement that occurs outside the US. The Court has also agreed to hear a patent case this term, and it will rule on a copyright fair-use case brought by the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts that was heard this fall. Queen of Christmas.

Trademark 130

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens All Rights Reserved False Advertising 130

LexBlog IP

APRIL 6, 2022

On March 25, 2022, the Supreme Court agreed to consider whether Andy Warhol’s “Prince Series” sufficiently transforms Lynn Goldsmith’s 1981 photograph of Prince (the “Photograph”) to qualify for the Copyright Act’s fair use defense. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., Goldsmith opposed the Petition.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Artwork Art Blogging 52

Patently-O

OCTOBER 11, 2022

On October 12, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the fair use copyright case of Andy Warhol Foundation, Inc. Andy Warhol admittedly used Lynn Goldmith’s copyrighted photographs of Prince as the basis for his set of sixteen silkscreens. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. , by Dennis Crouch. Goldsmith , Docket No.

Fair Use 134

Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work Art 134

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] 10] The more transformative a work is, the more likely it is to be considered fair use. Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v.

Fair Use 130

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 130

The IP Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Allen won first place at the Colorado State Fair (the “Competition”) for the two-dimensional artwork entitled Théâtre D’opéra Spatial (the “Work”), which he produced with the aid of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Last year, Jason M. were actually conceived and executed not by man but by machine.”

Art 120

Art Copyright Registration Fair Use 120

SpicyIP

MAY 18, 2022

In the US too, several companies are protecting their trademarks for similar goods and services. Hermes has sued a Californian artist, Mason Rothschild, for his “MetaBirkins” digital artworks alleging trademark infringement. Dec 21, 2021.

Non-Fungible Tokens 122

Non-Fungible Tokens Trademark Artwork Art 122

Plagiarism Today

OCTOBER 26, 2021

Where copyright protects works of creative authorship, such as books, movies, music, etc., Besides, even if a rightsholder did decide to target such home uses (which would likely be against their self-interest), it is almost certain that it would be found to be a fair use. However, copyright is only half the picture.

Copyright 235

Copyright Trademark Cease and Desist Copying 235

Kluwer Copyright Blog

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

AI-generated works have won awards: The Crow , an “AI-made” film won the Jury Award at the Cannes Short Film Festival and the story of an AI artwork winning the Colorado State Fair’s annual art competition was reported in The New York Times. Getty Images , Newgrounds , and PurplePort ).

Copyright 145

Copyright Art Fair Use Registration 145

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 30, 2022

Finally, it points out Viacom is the owner of three valid trademark registrations for the KRUSTY KRAB mark and 400 copyright registrations covering “creative aspects of the SpongeBob SquarePants franchise,” including episodes from the animated television series, movies, drawings, and stylebooks featuring artwork from the franchise.

Blogging 90

Blogging Social Media Television Fair Use 90

Copyright Lately

JANUARY 23, 2023

Let’s Talk About Derivative Works Subject to fair use and other defenses, a copyright owner has the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work. It gives the example of a musical composition inspired by a novel, which would not normally constitute infringement. 17 U.S.C. §

Derivative Work 108

Derivative Work Art Copying Fair Use 108

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Allen won first place at the Colorado State Fair (the “Competition”) for the two-dimensional artwork entitled Théâtre D’opéra Spatial (the “Work”), which he produced with the aid of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Last year, Jason M. Therefore, they dismissed this argument.

Art 52

Art Copyright Registration Fair Use 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 15, 2022

January 2022: Rapper Lil Yachty (real name: Miles Parks McCollum) sues NFT seller Opulous for trademark infringement based on Opulous using his name and likeness as part of a “Lil Yachty NFT Collection” advertising access to his new music. Miles Parks McCollum v. Opulous et al. 2:22-cv-00587, U.S. .”

IP 52

IP Non-Fungible Tokens Artwork Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides that “fair use of a copyrighted work.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 26, 2023

’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides that “fair use of a copyrighted work.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

OCTOBER 17, 2023

ChatGPT , Smodin ), to perform music (i.e., Apart from revolutionizing the creative markets, the ability to obtain new artworks with an increasing marginalization of human contribution has inevitably tested the fitness of copyright legislations all over the world to deal with the so-called “artificial intelligence” (‘AI’).

Copyright 124

Copyright Art Copyright Law Licensing 124

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 25, 2022

The development of these tokens has marked a new age of transparency and digital security as it is now possible to create and store a plethora of creations consisting of art, music, contracts, records, pictures, and even tweets as digital assets. Tokenisation and Ownership of Digital Assets under NFTs.

Non-Fungible Tokens 40

Non-Fungible Tokens IP Ownership Intellectual Property 40

IP Law 360

AUGUST 16, 2022

Supreme Court it should affirm a Second Circuit decision that Andy Warhol's artwork did not make fair use of a photo of music legend Prince, telling the justices that siding with Warhol "would dramatically expand" the fair-use doctrine. The Biden administration has told the U.S.

Fair Use 75

Fair Use Artwork Music IP 75

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2023

AI-generated vocals are roiling the music industry , with platforms acting to take down infringing content. Authors and copyright holders are concern ed that generative AI tools are built on the unauthorized and unremunerated use of their works, while at the same time negatively impacting their livelihood.

Copyright 138

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Law 138

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JULY 16, 2023

Accordingly, this case is a useful example of how a court will: (1) assess the derivation requirement (of actual copying) of UK copyright; and, (2) as part of that, consider similarity between musical works for the purpose of copyright infringement.” by Pamela Samuelson “In March 2022 the U.S.

Blogging 52

Blogging Law IP Fair Use 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

26] The defendants denied many of the allegations in the complaint, and asserted several affirmative defenses, including that the NFTs fell under the fair use exception to the Copyright Act. [27] by other innovators that also use NFTs to track title to physical goods held in a vault, such as fine art, whiskey, and wine.” [43].

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Branding 52

IIPRD

JANUARY 18, 2022

Some difficulties to be aware of and looked into more before buying NFTs i.e., anyone might snap a photo of an artwork, upload it to a blockchain, and sell it, therefore buyers must verify that they are buying NFTs from the artist or that the seller has the permission to sell the NFT.

Non-Fungible Tokens 40

Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Ownership Branding 40

LexBlog IP

APRIL 20, 2022

As described here in a previous post: The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected an artistic intent or purpose test for fair use on March 26, 2021, in The Andy Warhol Foundation v. ” Then, as I noted , the US Supreme Court decided a few days later, “in Google v. at 7-9) were transformative.,”

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Music Copyright Fair Use 52