Business Contracts Derivative Work Fair Use 
Plagiarism Today
SEPTEMBER 28, 2021
.” The site also removed any piece that they had received a complaint about and promised that they will do what they can to make up for “past mistakes” and that they are reviewing their business model going forward. The most straightforward and accurate answer to that question is simply, “We don’t know.”
Copyright Lately
MARCH 6, 2023
The case involves an interesting interplay between copyright law, entertainment contracts and the First Amendment. There’s a fair amount to unpack here, so let’s start with the facts, which I’ve compiled from my review of court files in both New York and California. .” LFP , Inc. , We cannot agree.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
AUGUST 11, 2022
Also: what about derivative works? So how do you build in that to recognize contribution to singular work v. creation of derivative work. In UK/Canada, joint ownership rules allow us to say “no derivative works without all of us agreeing.”
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 17, 2024
The plaintiff gets an expensive lesson in the law of derivative works. * * * UIRC offers bonds using a private placement memorandum (PPM) and an indenture of trust. This case expands the canon of copyright protection for lawyer-drafted documents such as legal briefs and contracts. Copyright Protection for Legal Documents.
IP Tech Blog
MARCH 18, 2022
NFTs can be based on three-dimensional items or artwork, or can be purely digital creations—for example, a collectable digital sneaker or a token used in a videogame. Most NFTs are protected under US Copyright Law as creative works and/or may be derivative works based on pre-existing copyright-protected works.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 17, 2023
Also, ignoring copyright licenses is at least arguably copyright infringement, and your fair use claim probably won’t get you out of the lawsuit at the motion to dismiss stage. But I think this might have more to do with the way the lawyers pleaded this issue rather than the quality of the potential breach of contract claim here.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
Sixth, assuming Woodward published copyrighted material without Trump’s authorization, was he permitted to do so, either as a fair use, or by the First Amendment? Absent consent, fair use, or a First Amendment defense, publishing the interviews without Trump’s consent is therefore a violation of his copyright.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
238 
Let's personalize your content