Cease and Desist Litigation Reporting Settlement 
The IPKat
MAY 5, 2024
UPCKat keeping warm on a stack of UPC awarded costs As part of our UPCKat reporting on the latest UPC developments, the IPKat continues its series of reports that analyze the development of preliminary injunction case law from the UPC. but ended with little in the way of preliminary injunction outcomes and a lot in the way of costs.
IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 26, 2023
The modus operandi of bullying and legal threats which are baseless by large entities gets initiated by serving a cease and desist notice which contains threats of instituting a trademark infringement suit. Further the defendants were also restrained from issuing any other baseless threats. [3]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Trading Secrets
JANUARY 24, 2024
Morgan Securities, LLC (“JPMS”) for allegedly including overbroad release provisions in settlement agreements. The rule broadly prohibits any person from taking any action to prevent an individual from contacting the SEC directly to report a possible securities law. with respect to such communications.”
Patent Trademark Blog
JUNE 2, 2023
Should you send a trademark cease-and-desist letter? Sending a trademark infringement cease-and-desist letter is a serious matter. As a result, the trademark owner is not only forced to litigate, but they must do so in an inconvenient venue which will substantially increase legal costs. What are your options then?
TorrentFreak
DECEMBER 26, 2022
“This can include engaging in open discussions by way of cease-and-desist notices on pirate operators, ensuring that illegal enterprises are voluntarily shut down, and criminal referrals to international and local law enforcement agencies.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2021
The Lenz case got a lot of press, but it ended with a confidential settlement. To my knowledge, the only litigated case that resulted in a 512(f) win was Online Policy Group v. The 512(f) plaintiff wins after 3 years of litigation and a bench trial. As a result, we’ve seen very, very few successful 512(f) enforcements.
The IP Law Blog
MARCH 2, 2021
When settlement discussions proved fruitless, Romag sued. Will it incentivize more trademark litigation since it clearly establishes that a showing of willfulness is not required to obtain a profits award? After trial, the jury found that Fossil had acted “in callous disregard” of Romag’s intellectual property rights.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
70 
Let's personalize your content