Confidentiality Copyright Ownership Settlement 
Nelligan Law
FEBRUARY 20, 2024
As tattoo artists draw inspiration from a plethora of sources, ranging from classical art to pop culture icons, questions of ownership, originality, and copyright infringement have commandeered the spotlight in the tattooing arena. At the crux of both cases lies the conundrum of copyright ownership and infringement.
TorrentFreak
APRIL 17, 2023
Domain Shows No Sign of MPA/ACE Ownership Domains under full MPA/ACE control usually have a particular signature. Considering that pirates represent obvious targets, a smart opening move in a hypothetical scenario would be to ensure no one else gets involved by insisting on confidentiality.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Intepat
JUNE 19, 2023
The various forms of intellectual property are already well known- trademarks, patents, copyrights, industrial designs, trade secrets, domain names and geographical indications. Therefore, it is important to make sure such confidential information is not publicised unauthorisedly. The ownership is not transferred.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
JULY 11, 2022
The arrangement between Eros and Telemax was for the licencing of Telemax’s copyrighted Eros content. Eros learned that Telemax was violating its copyright, and in accordance with the arbitration provision, the case was referred to an arbitrator. In another IPR-related case, Indian Performing Rights Society (IPRS) Ltd.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2021
A refresher: in 1998, Congress created a notice-and-takedown scheme for user-submitted items that allegedly infringe copyright. Copyright owners send takedown notices, and service providers either remove the items or lose the safe harbor. The DMCA’s main counterbalance to copyright owner overreach was supposed to be 512(f).
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
79 
Let's personalize your content