Confidentiality Litigation Privacy Settlement 
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 2, 2021
A settlement agreement was reached where Elation could inspect the software developed by Shi and prevent the use of any trade secrets or confidential information. The jury also found Shi breached the settlement agreement. Elation could then reinspect the software both before and after the first sale of the product by Shi.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 17, 2023
DTSA fully opened the federal courts to trade secret litigation as well as added several new features, including an ex parte seizure remedy and whistleblower immunity. David Almeling and Victoria Cundiff are two of the most experienced trade secret litigators in the nation. DTSA added to the large and growing federal caseloads.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
There’s also a copyright claim for Luxy copying the plaintiff’s TOS/privacy policy. The litigants use the Internet, but who doesn’t, so normally the court would say this factor is irrelevant. 1-800 Contacts. * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 26, 2024
NY Times : SmileDirectClub to Release Customers From NDAs in Settlement Other Consumer Issues * Pop v. Rivals * MIT Technology Review : This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI (regarding “Nightshade”) Privacy * FTC v. Gallagher Data Breach Litigation , 631 F.Supp.3d July 20, 2023).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content