SpicyIP

MAY 3, 2023

are typically objected to on the grounds of personality rights (publicity rights, celebrity rights, by other names), privacy and (to a limited extent) defamation. Such treatment usually amounts to violations of the moral rights of the author.

Moral Rights 114

Moral Rights Personality Rights Copyright Privacy 114

43(B)log

JUNE 26, 2023

The underlying lawsuit asserted misappropriation of images and likenesses for advertising purposes under state law; violation of the Virginia business conspiracy statute; and violations of the Lanham Act for false advertising and false association. The Virginia ROP “protects both a property interest and a right to privacy.”

Advertising 72

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Intellectual Property 72

IIPRD

JANUARY 29, 2023

The issues pertaining to the rights of VTubers encompass rights to the design of the character, the privacy of the individual, licensing and taking inspiration from an existing character. However, the conversation being considered as a contract between them was unclear regarding the IP rights.

IP 52

IP Artwork Contracts Intellectual Property 52

Art Law Journal

AUGUST 18, 2022

For example, California has special laws designed to limit paparazzi photographs, thanks to its high number of celebrity residents. Laws regarding the use of a person’s likeness, also known as the right of publicity, ensures that a model or other subject of an artwork controls the commercial exploitation of their name, image, or persona.

Publishing 85

Publishing Art Contracts Artwork 85

The IPKat

JANUARY 21, 2022

Recognising the challenges for performers in the position and enforcement of their rights, the book also includes discussion on other forms of protections and remedies for performers, such as moral rights, contracts, passing off and copyright infringement. The book is presented in 11 chapters. What about a juggler?

Moral Rights 128

Moral Rights Contracts Editing Related Rights 128

SpicyIP

JULY 13, 2021

student at the NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad. The plaintiff censured the defendants for violating privacy, right to publicity, free and fair trial, also invoking the Ashok Kumar jurisdiction of the court. Next, it delved into the question of the perpetuity or descendibility of these rights. Nishtha Gupta.

Privacy 105

Privacy Personality Rights Moral Rights Copyright 105

IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 20, 2024

Protecting personality rights has become a growing problem in India due to deepfakes, morphed pictures, etc. In between these problems came Delhi High Court’s judgement in favour of Anil Kapoor wanting to get personality rights. Interesting right? Puttaswamy v. The Plaintiff also referenced Vanna White v.

Personality Rights 63

Personality Rights Privacy Social Media Intellectual Property 63