Copyright Editing Moral Rights Registration 
IPilogue
MARCH 29, 2023
In March 2022, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) allowed its first artificial intelligence (AI)-authored copyright registration of a painting co-created by the AI tool, RAGHAV Painting App (“RAGHAV”), and the IP lawyer who created RAGHAV, Ankit Sahni. RAGHAV is the first non-human “author” of a copyrighted work.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 15, 2023
It does seem a bit one-sided in making it sound (to me, anyway) like people, governments or courts who oppose copyright protection of AI-generated works are fighting a rear guard battle and that at some point copyright protection of such works will almost “naturally” happen. Copyright Act, R.S.C.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Plagiarism Today
JANUARY 18, 2022
Owning a copy of the book, regardless of how expensive, does not grant them the copyrights in it. The fact that so few copies exist means that burning it may run afoul of the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) if the editions are signed and numbered. In other nations, moral rights may prohibit that.
IPilogue
MARCH 29, 2023
RAGHAV is the first non-human “author” of a copyrighted work. However, Canadian courts claim that “[c]learly a human author is required to create an original work for copyright purposes” (para 88). However, Canadian courts claim that “[c]learly a human author is required to create an original work for copyright purposes” (para 88).
43(B)log
AUGUST 11, 2021
McFarlin, A Copyright Ignored? Taking him at his word: Did Twain infringe her common-law copyright? Shani Shisha, Copyright Pragmatism Formalities provoked a strong pragmatic reaction from courts. Told story “repeated word for word as I heard it.” Would that still exist today? Federal preemption.] They’re both authors.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 19, 2022
Copyright Law Why are we so sure facts are excluded from the statute when the statute doesn’t use that word and uses a lot of other words. Harper & Row is cited by Feist to reiterate that selection coordination and arrangements of facts can be copyrightable. Natural or moral right to own fruit of labors.
The IPKat
FEBRUARY 21, 2022
Topics include access and substantial similarity, fair use, performers’ rights, moral rights, expert testimony, the role of lay listeners, sound sampling, as demonstrated in dispositions of litigated and settled infringement disputes. Registration is open here. More information about this event here.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
105 
Let's personalize your content