Derivative Work Fair Use Licensing Ownership 
LexBlog IP
MAY 19, 2023
In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. The first factor of fair use considers the nature of and reasons for a copier’s use of an original work. [4]
Velocity of Content
MARCH 16, 2023
After all, while we are pondering the weighty issue of future ownership, we are not focusing on the fundamental issue of wholesale copying of works to train AI in a wide variety of situations. I speculated that this was an attempt to avoid a messy fair use dispute. is being used as code.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright Lately
AUGUST 2, 2022
And unlike the vast majority of songwriters and performing artists who have relinquished ownership rights to musical publishers and record labels, Barlow & Bear decided to release “The Unofficial Bridgerton Musical” themselves, which means keeping more of the earnings. A Musical Parody ” and “ Friends!
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 1, 2023
Although the notice focuses on copyrightability, ownership questions will also come into play. The copyright office seeks input on the legality of training generative models on copyrighted works obtained via the open internet, but without an express license. A traditional approach would allow for joint liability.
IIPRD
APRIL 8, 2024
This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. And then further questions like if given protection under IPR, will that be fair to the initial creators, whose works were used without consent or licensing to create these so-called novel art pieces?
Copyright Lately
MAY 1, 2023
Companies have to obtain permission and execute a license to use copyrighted content for AI training or other purposes, and we’re committed to maintaining these legal principles.” By the way, I purposely used the names of individuals in my example to make a point. We own all sounds captured on a sound recording.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 3, 2023
In 1963, Disney expressed skepticism about monopoly aspects of extended term and “expressed doubt that Congress would approve a longer ownership period.” Hughes: it was the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, not the DMCA, which was intertwined. Works almost like a fair use defense. 3) “So what?”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content